CLLXF
Price
$0.60
Change
+$0.01 (+1.69%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
GSM
Price
$3.83
Change
-$0.03 (-0.78%)
Updated
Dec 23, 10:47 AM (EDT)
70 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CLLXF vs GSM

Header iconCLLXF vs GSM Comparison
Open Charts CLLXF vs GSMBanner chart's image
Callinex Mines
Price$0.60
Change+$0.01 (+1.69%)
Volume$17.79K
CapitalizationN/A
Ferroglobe
Price$3.83
Change-$0.03 (-0.78%)
Volume$450
CapitalizationN/A
CLLXF vs GSM Comparison Chart
Loading...
CLLXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLLXF vs. GSM commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLLXF is a Hold and GSM is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (CLLXF: $0.60 vs. GSM: $3.87)
Brand notoriety: CLLXF and GSM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLLXF: 185% vs. GSM: 199%
Market capitalization -- CLLXF: $35.08M vs. GSM: $892.18M
CLLXF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $35.08M. GSM’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $892.18M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLLXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGSM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CLLXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GSM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GSM is a better buy in the long-term than CLLXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLLXF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GSM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLLXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GSM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLLXF is a better buy in the short-term than GSM.

Price Growth

CLLXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -3.34% price change this week, while GSM (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -6.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

GSM is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-1.74% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSM($892M) has a higher market cap than CLLXF($35.1M). CLLXF has higher P/E ratio than GSM: CLLXF (1111.11) vs GSM (10.35). GSM YTD gains are higher at: -39.858 vs. CLLXF (-55.556). GSM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 281M vs. CLLXF (337K). CLLXF has less debt than GSM: CLLXF (74.7K) vs GSM (238M). GSM has higher revenues than CLLXF: GSM (1.72B) vs CLLXF (0).
CLLXFGSMCLLXF / GSM
Capitalization35.1M892M4%
EBITDA337K281M0%
Gain YTD-55.556-39.858139%
P/E Ratio1111.1110.3510,738%
Revenue01.72B-
Total Cash6.71MN/A-
Total Debt74.7K238M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLLXF vs GSM: Fundamental Ratings
CLLXF
GSM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10051
SMR RATING
1..100
9083
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8783
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1911
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GSM's Valuation (15) in the Industrial Specialties industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLLXF (98) in the null industry. This means that GSM’s stock grew significantly faster than CLLXF’s over the last 12 months.

GSM's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLLXF (100) in the null industry. This means that GSM’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLLXF’s over the last 12 months.

GSM's SMR Rating (83) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as CLLXF (90) in the null industry. This means that GSM’s stock grew similarly to CLLXF’s over the last 12 months.

GSM's Price Growth Rating (83) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as CLLXF (87) in the null industry. This means that GSM’s stock grew similarly to CLLXF’s over the last 12 months.

GSM's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as CLLXF (19) in the null industry. This means that GSM’s stock grew similarly to CLLXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLLXFGSM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
73%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CLLXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EBON6.600.19
+2.96%
Ebang International Holdings
NVCR30.800.40
+1.32%
NovoCure Limited
POST114.850.48
+0.42%
Post Holdings
KODK6.85-0.03
-0.44%
Eastman Kodak Company
INFY22.73-0.69
-2.95%
Infosys Limited

CLLXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLLXF and GSM have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLLXF and GSM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLLXF
1D Price
Change %
CLLXF100%
+1.66%
GSM - CLLXF
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.73%
TECK - CLLXF
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.38%
SOUHY - CLLXF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.64%
ERO - CLLXF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.77%
SCCO - CLLXF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.12%
More

GSM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSM has been loosely correlated with MTRN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GSM jumps, then MTRN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSM
1D Price
Change %
GSM100%
+2.73%
MTRN - GSM
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
CCJ - GSM
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.89%
ARREF - GSM
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
MP - GSM
39%
Loosely correlated
-2.10%
MJDLF - GSM
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.41%
More