CLMT
Price
$11.95
Change
-$1.20 (-9.13%)
Updated
Apr 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.19B
35 days until earnings call
FARYF
Price
$0.33
Change
+$0.02 (+6.45%)
Updated
Feb 25 closing price
Capitalization
49.34M
Ad is loading...

CLMT vs FARYF

Header iconCLMT vs FARYF Comparison
Open Charts CLMT vs FARYFBanner chart's image
Calumet
Price$11.95
Change-$1.20 (-9.13%)
Volume$39.24K
Capitalization1.19B
Far
Price$0.33
Change+$0.02 (+6.45%)
Volume$3.71K
Capitalization49.34M
CLMT vs FARYF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CLMT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLMT vs. FARYF commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLMT is a Hold and FARYF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FARYF: $0.33)
Brand notoriety:
Market capitalization --

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FARYF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.

  • FARYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLMT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CLMT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

FARYF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а 0.00% price change this weekfor the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -3.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.73%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (-3.45% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLMT($1.19B) has a higher market cap than FARYF($49.3M). FARYF has higher P/E ratio than CLMT: FARYF (55.25) vs CLMT (25.19). FARYF YTD gains are higher at: 1.072 vs. CLMT (-40.282). CLMT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 418M vs. FARYF (-39.75M). FARYF has more cash in the bank: 55.6M vs. CLMT (7.9M). FARYF has less debt than CLMT: FARYF (71.4K) vs CLMT (2B). CLMT has higher revenues than FARYF: CLMT (4.18B) vs FARYF (3.12M).
CLMTFARYFCLMT / FARYF
Capitalization1.19B49.3M2,418%
EBITDA418M-39.75M-1,051%
Gain YTD-40.2821.072-3,758%
P/E Ratio25.1955.2546%
Revenue4.18B3.12M133,878%
Total Cash7.9M55.6M14%
Total Debt2B71.4K2,801,120%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLMT vs FARYF: Fundamental Ratings
CLMT
FARYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
243
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
41100
SMR RATING
1..100
10095
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8645
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5474
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FARYF's Valuation (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLMT (75) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that FARYF’s stock grew significantly faster than CLMT’s over the last 12 months.

CLMT's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FARYF (100) in the null industry. This means that CLMT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FARYF’s over the last 12 months.

FARYF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as CLMT (100) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that FARYF’s stock grew similarly to CLMT’s over the last 12 months.

FARYF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLMT (86) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that FARYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLMT’s over the last 12 months.

CLMT's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as FARYF (74) in the null industry. This means that CLMT’s stock grew similarly to FARYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLMT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CLMT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MRSKX23.460.03
+0.13%
MFS Research International R6
AVEAX14.80N/A
N/A
Ave Maria Focused
RYVLX458.98N/A
N/A
Rydex NASDAQ-100® 2x Strategy A
MERIX17.31N/A
N/A
The Merger Fund I
JASOX23.63N/A
N/A
JHancock New Opportunities A

CLMT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLMT and MEGEF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLMT and MEGEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLMT
1D Price
Change %
CLMT100%
+3.30%
MEGEF - CLMT
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
HES - CLMT
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
IPOOF - CLMT
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.04%
NUVSF - CLMT
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.09%
SPGYF - CLMT
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.93%
More

FARYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FARYF and KSTOF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FARYF and KSTOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FARYF
1D Price
Change %
FARYF100%
N/A
KSTOF - FARYF
26%
Poorly correlated
+35.46%
PTXLF - FARYF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLMT - FARYF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.30%
TPL - FARYF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.85%
EWPMF - FARYF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More