It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLNN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFBRX’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLNN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FBRX’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CLNN (@Biotechnology) experienced а -11.56% price change this week, while FBRX (@Biotechnology) price change was -16.38% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was -3.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.23%.
CLNN is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2024.
FBRX is expected to report earnings on Nov 15, 2024.
Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.
CLNN | FBRX | CLNN / FBRX | |
Capitalization | 34.8M | 28.7M | 121% |
EBITDA | -29.61M | -35.6M | 83% |
Gain YTD | -26.500 | -4.296 | 617% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 421K | 0 | - |
Total Cash | 14.6M | 16.4M | 89% |
Total Debt | 22.9M | N/A | - |
CLNN | FBRX | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 32 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | 98 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 99 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | 56 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CLNN's Valuation (85) in the null industry is in the same range as FBRX (98). This means that CLNN’s stock grew similarly to FBRX’s over the last 12 months.
FBRX's Profit vs Risk Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as CLNN (100). This means that FBRX’s stock grew similarly to CLNN’s over the last 12 months.
FBRX's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as CLNN (100). This means that FBRX’s stock grew similarly to CLNN’s over the last 12 months.
FBRX's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as CLNN (64). This means that FBRX’s stock grew similarly to CLNN’s over the last 12 months.
FBRX's P/E Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLNN (96). This means that FBRX’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLNN’s over the last 12 months.
CLNN | FBRX | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago88% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago77% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% | 2 days ago79% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago74% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago85% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago71% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago80% | 13 days ago73% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 9 days ago85% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago76% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | 2 days ago76% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CLNN and KZIA have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLNN and KZIA's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLNN | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CLNN | 100% | -7.23% | ||
KZIA - CLNN | 33% Poorly correlated | +2.10% | ||
GOSS - CLNN | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.71% | ||
QNCX - CLNN | 29% Poorly correlated | -3.66% | ||
VRNA - CLNN | 28% Poorly correlated | -2.39% | ||
VKTX - CLNN | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.12% | ||
More |