To understand the difference between Coloplast AS - Ordinary Shares - Class B (CLPBF) vs. Coloplast AS - ADR (CLPBY) it is enough to know the definitions of Ordinary Shares - Class B and ADR
Ordinary Shares - Class B - Generally, Class B shares are issued by a company as a common stock with fewer voting rights and lower dividend priority than Class A shares. Class B may also have lower repayment priority in the event of a bankruptcy.
ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLPBF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCLPBY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLPBF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLPBY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CLPBF (@Medical Specialties) experienced а -5.61% price change this week, while CLPBY (@Medical Specialties) price change was -3.56% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was -4.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.66%.
CLPBY is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2025.
Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.
CLPBF | CLPBY | CLPBF / CLPBY | |
Capitalization | 26.5B | 26.5B | 100% |
EBITDA | 7.65B | 7.65B | 100% |
Gain YTD | -2.708 | 3.254 | -83% |
P/E Ratio | 36.76 | 36.50 | 101% |
Revenue | 24.1B | 24.1B | 100% |
Total Cash | 881M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 22.2B | N/A | - |
CLPBF | CLPBY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 84 | 55 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 6 Undervalued | 7 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 80 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 33 | 33 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | 76 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CLPBF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as CLPBY (7). This means that CLPBF’s stock grew similarly to CLPBY’s over the last 12 months.
CLPBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as CLPBF (100). This means that CLPBY’s stock grew similarly to CLPBF’s over the last 12 months.
CLPBY's SMR Rating (33) in the null industry is in the same range as CLPBF (33). This means that CLPBY’s stock grew similarly to CLPBF’s over the last 12 months.
CLPBY's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as CLPBF (77). This means that CLPBY’s stock grew similarly to CLPBF’s over the last 12 months.
CLPBY's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as CLPBF (76). This means that CLPBY’s stock grew similarly to CLPBF’s over the last 12 months.
CLPBF | CLPBY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago48% | 2 days ago57% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago57% | 2 days ago65% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago60% | 2 days ago52% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago53% | 2 days ago66% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago50% | 2 days ago55% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago52% | 2 days ago56% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago61% | 22 days ago68% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago55% | 2 days ago54% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago56% | 2 days ago59% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago54% | 2 days ago67% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
GSLAX | 16.42 | N/A | N/A |
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value A | |||
ABRWX | 18.50 | -0.04 | -0.22% |
DSS AmericaFirstMonthlyRisk-OnRisk-Off I | |||
CPECX | 20.43 | -0.12 | -0.58% |
Catalyst Dynamic Alpha C | |||
PSSJX | 26.88 | -0.38 | -1.39% |
Principal SmallCap S&P 600 Index J | |||
JACNX | 28.37 | -0.47 | -1.63% |
Janus Henderson Contrarian D |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLPBF has been loosely correlated with CLPBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLPBF jumps, then CLPBY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLPBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CLPBF | 100% | N/A | ||
CLPBY - CLPBF | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.90% | ||
AHICF - CLPBF | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
WILLF - CLPBF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
QDEL - CLPBF | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.85% | ||
ESLOY - CLPBF | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.51% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLPBY has been loosely correlated with CLPBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLPBY jumps, then CLPBF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLPBY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CLPBY | 100% | -1.90% | ||
CLPBF - CLPBY | 38% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
SAUHY - CLPBY | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
SMMNY - CLPBY | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.89% | ||
SONVY - CLPBY | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.51% | ||
ESLOY - CLPBY | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.51% | ||
More |