CLPBY
Price
$11.12
Change
+$0.05 (+0.45%)
Updated
Apr 28 closing price
Capitalization
26.46B
7 days until earnings call
SEMHF
Price
$50.60
Change
+$1.65 (+3.37%)
Updated
Apr 24 closing price
Capitalization
65B
Ad is loading...

CLPBY vs SEMHF

Header iconCLPBY vs SEMHF Comparison
Open Charts CLPBY vs SEMHFBanner chart's image
Coloplast AS
Price$11.12
Change+$0.05 (+0.45%)
Volume$125.65K
Capitalization26.46B
Siemens Healthineers AG
Price$50.60
Change+$1.65 (+3.37%)
Volume$246
Capitalization65B
CLPBY vs SEMHF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CLPBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLPBY vs. SEMHF commentary
Apr 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLPBY is a StrongBuy and SEMHF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CLPBY: $11.12 vs. SEMHF: $50.60)
Brand notoriety: CLPBY and SEMHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLPBY: 59% vs. SEMHF: 33%
Market capitalization -- CLPBY: $26.46B vs. SEMHF: $65B
CLPBY [@Medical Specialties] is valued at $26.46B. SEMHF’s [@Medical Specialties] market capitalization is $65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $8.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLPBY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSEMHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLPBY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SEMHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLPBY is a better buy in the long-term than SEMHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLPBY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CLPBY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CLPBY (@Medical Specialties) experienced а +4.71% price change this week, while SEMHF (@Medical Specialties) price change was +3.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was +7.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLPBY is expected to report earnings on Aug 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Specialties (+7.52% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SEMHF($65B) has a higher market cap than CLPBY($26.5B). SEMHF has higher P/E ratio than CLPBY: SEMHF (38.61) vs CLPBY (36.50). CLPBY YTD gains are higher at: 2.394 vs. SEMHF (-4.366). CLPBY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.65B vs. SEMHF (3.79B). CLPBY has higher revenues than SEMHF: CLPBY (24.1B) vs SEMHF (21.6B).
CLPBYSEMHFCLPBY / SEMHF
Capitalization26.5B65B41%
EBITDA7.65B3.79B202%
Gain YTD2.394-4.366-55%
P/E Ratio36.5038.6195%
Revenue24.1B21.6B112%
Total CashN/A1.75B-
Total DebtN/A654M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLPBY vs SEMHF: Fundamental Ratings
CLPBY
SEMHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2636
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10071
SMR RATING
1..100
3166
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5475
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6483
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CLPBY's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as SEMHF (8). This means that CLPBY’s stock grew similarly to SEMHF’s over the last 12 months.

SEMHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as CLPBY (100). This means that SEMHF’s stock grew similarly to CLPBY’s over the last 12 months.

CLPBY's SMR Rating (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SEMHF (66). This means that CLPBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SEMHF’s over the last 12 months.

CLPBY's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as SEMHF (75). This means that CLPBY’s stock grew similarly to SEMHF’s over the last 12 months.

CLPBY's P/E Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as SEMHF (83). This means that CLPBY’s stock grew similarly to SEMHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLPBY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CLPBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MIDU35.630.37
+1.05%
Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X ETF
ERET25.810.12
+0.47%
iShares Environmentally Aware Rl Est ETF
AIRR69.710.14
+0.20%
First Trust RBA Amer Indl RenaisTM ETF
NANC36.11-0.13
-0.36%
Unusual Whales Subversive Dem Trd ETF
VVR3.56-0.07
-1.93%
Invesco Senior Income Trust

CLPBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLPBY has been loosely correlated with CLPBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLPBY jumps, then CLPBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLPBY
1D Price
Change %
CLPBY100%
+0.45%
CLPBF - CLPBY
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SAUHY - CLPBY
34%
Loosely correlated
+2.91%
SMMNY - CLPBY
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
SONVY - CLPBY
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
ESLOY - CLPBY
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
More

SEMHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SEMHF and ECIA have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SEMHF and ECIA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SEMHF
1D Price
Change %
SEMHF100%
N/A
ECIA - SEMHF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLPBY - SEMHF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
SARTF - SEMHF
6%
Poorly correlated
-3.27%
SKHCF - SEMHF
5%
Poorly correlated
+3.07%
SAUHY - SEMHF
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.91%
More