CLPE
Price
$1.38
Change
-$0.02 (-1.43%)
Updated
Jan 9 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
CMSQY
Price
$25.88
Change
+$0.07 (+0.27%)
Updated
Mar 3 closing price
Capitalization
10.1B
Ad is loading...

CLPE vs CMSQY

Header iconCLPE vs CMSQY Comparison
Open Charts CLPE vs CMSQYBanner chart's image
Clear Peak Energy
Price$1.38
Change-$0.02 (-1.43%)
Volume$150
CapitalizationN/A
Computershare
Price$25.88
Change+$0.07 (+0.27%)
Volume$29.99K
Capitalization10.1B
CLPE vs CMSQY Comparison Chart
Loading...
CMSQY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLPE vs. CMSQY commentary
Mar 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLPE is a Hold and CMSQY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CLPE: $1.38 vs. CMSQY: $25.88)
Brand notoriety: CLPE and CMSQY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLPE: 100% vs. CMSQY: 117%
Market capitalization -- CLPE: $0 vs. CMSQY: $10.1B
CLPE [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $0. CMSQY’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $10.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLPE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCMSQY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CLPE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CMSQY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMSQY is a better buy in the long-term than CLPE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMSQY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CMSQY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CLPE (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CMSQY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -2.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.24%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-3.11% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMSQY YTD gains are higher at: 25.414 vs. CLPE (0.000).
CLPECMSQYCLPE / CMSQY
CapitalizationN/A10.1B-
EBITDAN/A825M-
Gain YTD0.00025.414-
P/E RatioN/A32.15-
RevenueN/A2.9B-
Total CashN/A1.08B-
Total DebtN/A2.77B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLPE vs CMSQY: Fundamental Ratings
CLPE
CMSQY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3023
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1006
SMR RATING
1..100
10062
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6938
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10033
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMSQY's Valuation (30) in the null industry is in the same range as CLPE (38). This means that CMSQY’s stock grew similarly to CLPE’s over the last 12 months.

CMSQY's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLPE (100). This means that CMSQY’s stock grew significantly faster than CLPE’s over the last 12 months.

CMSQY's SMR Rating (62) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLPE (100). This means that CMSQY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLPE’s over the last 12 months.

CMSQY's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as CLPE (69). This means that CMSQY’s stock grew similarly to CLPE’s over the last 12 months.

CMSQY's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLPE (100). This means that CMSQY’s stock grew significantly faster than CLPE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMSQY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CMSQY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LYSDY4.190.02
+0.48%
Lynas Rare Earths Limited
FGFCX35.20N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes International Leaders C
TRWCX21.73N/A
N/A
Transamerica International Equity C
GELYY45.00-0.36
-0.79%
Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd.
BBKCF0.10N/A
-2.74%
BIGG Digital Assets Inc.

CLPE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLPE and WAI have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLPE and WAI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLPE
1D Price
Change %
CLPE100%
N/A
WAI - CLPE
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.93%
DMGGF - CLPE
9%
Poorly correlated
-4.02%
DBOEY - CLPE
7%
Poorly correlated
+3.42%
CMSQY - CLPE
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
CIIHY - CLPE
0%
Poorly correlated
-4.45%
More

CMSQY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMSQY has been loosely correlated with MQBKY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMSQY jumps, then MQBKY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMSQY
1D Price
Change %
CMSQY100%
+0.27%
MQBKY - CMSQY
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.73%
ASXFY - CMSQY
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
SNEX - CMSQY
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.15%
GS - CMSQY
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.74%
NMR - CMSQY
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.09%
More