CLPHY
Price
$8.29
Change
-$0.01 (-0.12%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
21.05B
HRNNF
Price
$35.85
Change
+$0.45 (+1.27%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
21.35B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLPHY vs HRNNF

Header iconCLPHY vs HRNNF Comparison
Open Charts CLPHY vs HRNNFBanner chart's image
CLP Holdings
Price$8.29
Change-$0.01 (-0.12%)
Volume$49.7K
Capitalization21.05B
Hydro One
Price$35.85
Change+$0.45 (+1.27%)
Volume$540
Capitalization21.35B
CLPHY vs HRNNF Comparison Chart in %
CLPHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HRNNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLPHY vs. HRNNF commentary
Oct 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLPHY is a Buy and HRNNF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CLPHY: $8.28 vs. HRNNF: $35.85)
Brand notoriety: CLPHY and HRNNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLPHY: 82% vs. HRNNF: 25%
Market capitalization -- CLPHY: $21.05B vs. HRNNF: $21.35B
CLPHY [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $21.05B. HRNNF’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $21.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $164.87B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $22.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLPHY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHRNNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLPHY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HRNNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HRNNF is a better buy in the long-term than CLPHY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLPHY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HRNNF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLPHY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HRNNF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLPHY is a better buy in the short-term than HRNNF.

Price Growth

CLPHY (@Electric Utilities) experienced а +0.67% price change this week, while HRNNF (@Electric Utilities) price change was +1.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +0.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.83%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (+0.70% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HRNNF($21.3B) and CLPHY($21B) have the same market capitalization . HRNNF has higher P/E ratio than CLPHY: HRNNF (23.95) vs CLPHY (14.27). HRNNF YTD gains are higher at: 17.276 vs. CLPHY (4.010). CLPHY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 26.4B vs. HRNNF (3.05B). CLPHY has higher revenues than HRNNF: CLPHY (89.7B) vs HRNNF (8.76B).
CLPHYHRNNFCLPHY / HRNNF
Capitalization21B21.3B99%
EBITDA26.4B3.05B865%
Gain YTD4.01017.27623%
P/E Ratio14.2723.9560%
Revenue89.7B8.76B1,024%
Total CashN/A71M-
Total DebtN/A18.1B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLPHY vs HRNNF: Fundamental Ratings
CLPHY
HRNNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6650
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7814
SMR RATING
1..100
10069
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5757
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8948
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HRNNF's Valuation (73) in the null industry is in the same range as CLPHY (94). This means that HRNNF’s stock grew similarly to CLPHY’s over the last 12 months.

HRNNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLPHY (78). This means that HRNNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLPHY’s over the last 12 months.

HRNNF's SMR Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as CLPHY (100). This means that HRNNF’s stock grew similarly to CLPHY’s over the last 12 months.

HRNNF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as CLPHY (57). This means that HRNNF’s stock grew similarly to CLPHY’s over the last 12 months.

HRNNF's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLPHY (89). This means that HRNNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLPHY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLPHYHRNNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLPHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HRNNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PICK45.440.42
+0.93%
iShares MSCI Global Mtls&Mng Prdcrs ETF
RSMC26.320.11
+0.40%
Rockefeller U.S. Small-Mid Cap ETF
NXTE40.230.04
+0.10%
AXS Green Alpha ETF
EMNT98.580.02
+0.02%
PIMCO Enhanced Short Mtrty Actv ESG ETF
QQQM248.32-1.01
-0.41%
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF

CLPHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLPHY and HRNNF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLPHY and HRNNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLPHY
1D Price
Change %
CLPHY100%
-0.06%
HRNNF - CLPHY
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.27%
KEP - CLPHY
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
CLPHF - CLPHY
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CKISF - CLPHY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CKISY - CLPHY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A

HRNNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HRNNF has been loosely correlated with FTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HRNNF jumps, then FTS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HRNNF
1D Price
Change %
HRNNF100%
+1.27%
FTS - HRNNF
48%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NEE - HRNNF
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.40%
NWE - HRNNF
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.23%
EVRG - HRNNF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
EIX - HRNNF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.47%
More