CLPMF
Price
$0.22
Change
+$0.01 (+4.76%)
Updated
Sep 15 closing price
Capitalization
19.03M
CVOSF
Price
$6.39
Change
-$0.20 (-3.03%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
618.05M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLPMF vs CVOSF

Header iconCLPMF vs CVOSF Comparison
Open Charts CLPMF vs CVOSFBanner chart's image
Clip Money
Price$0.22
Change+$0.01 (+4.76%)
Volume$400
Capitalization19.03M
COVEO SOLUTIONS
Price$6.39
Change-$0.20 (-3.03%)
Volume$5.41K
Capitalization618.05M
CLPMF vs CVOSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLPMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CVOSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLPMF vs. CVOSF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLPMF is a Hold and CVOSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CLPMF: $0.22 vs. CVOSF: $6.39)
Brand notoriety: CLPMF and CVOSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLPMF: 24% vs. CVOSF: 8%
Market capitalization -- CLPMF: $19.03M vs. CVOSF: $618.05M
CLPMF [@Computer Communications] is valued at $19.03M. CVOSF’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $618.05M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.77T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $26.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLPMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCVOSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLPMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CVOSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CVOSF is a better buy in the long-term than CLPMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLPMF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CVOSF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLPMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CVOSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CLPMF and CVOSF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CLPMF (@Computer Communications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CVOSF (@Computer Communications) price change was -3.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -0.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +66.12%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (-0.48% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CVOSF($618M) has a higher market cap than CLPMF($19M). CVOSF YTD gains are higher at: 36.028 vs. CLPMF (4.302). CLPMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -4.43M vs. CVOSF (-8.04M). CVOSF has more cash in the bank: 128M vs. CLPMF (1.7M). CVOSF has less debt than CLPMF: CVOSF (7.28M) vs CLPMF (18.9M). CVOSF has higher revenues than CLPMF: CVOSF (137M) vs CLPMF (4M).
CLPMFCVOSFCLPMF / CVOSF
Capitalization19M618M3%
EBITDA-4.43M-8.04M55%
Gain YTD4.30236.02812%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue4M137M3%
Total Cash1.7M128M1%
Total Debt18.9M7.28M260%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLPMFCVOSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLPMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CVOSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GTSFX40.42N/A
N/A
Invesco Small Cap Growth R6
WICGX6.91N/A
N/A
William Blair China Growth I
MUTHX26.78N/A
N/A
Franklin Mutual Shares Z
SCAVX14.73N/A
N/A
AB Small Cap Value A
LFGAX42.82N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Focused Growth A

CLPMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLPMF and GB have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLPMF and GB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLPMF
1D Price
Change %
CLPMF100%
N/A
GB - CLPMF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGL - CLPMF
9%
Poorly correlated
-6.09%
RUM - CLPMF
5%
Poorly correlated
-4.52%
SDCH - CLPMF
3%
Poorly correlated
-10.00%
CVOSF - CLPMF
0%
Poorly correlated
-2.98%
More

CVOSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CVOSF has been loosely correlated with SPMYY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CVOSF jumps, then SPMYY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CVOSF
1D Price
Change %
CVOSF100%
-2.98%
SPMYY - CVOSF
56%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SPNUF - CVOSF
54%
Loosely correlated
-2.95%
AISP - CVOSF
43%
Loosely correlated
+4.47%
LIFX - CVOSF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DAVE - CVOSF
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.51%
More