CLPMF
Price
$0.23
Change
+$0.06 (+35.29%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
20.63M
CVOSF
Price
$6.40
Change
+$0.08 (+1.27%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
614.56M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLPMF vs CVOSF

Header iconCLPMF vs CVOSF Comparison
Open Charts CLPMF vs CVOSFBanner chart's image
Clip Money
Price$0.23
Change+$0.06 (+35.29%)
Volume$1.55K
Capitalization20.63M
COVEO SOLUTIONS
Price$6.40
Change+$0.08 (+1.27%)
Volume$3.61K
Capitalization614.56M
CLPMF vs CVOSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLPMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CVOSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLPMF vs. CVOSF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLPMF is a Buy and CVOSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CLPMF: $0.23 vs. CVOSF: $6.40)
Brand notoriety: CLPMF and CVOSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLPMF: 37% vs. CVOSF: 13%
Market capitalization -- CLPMF: $20.63M vs. CVOSF: $614.56M
CLPMF [@Computer Communications] is valued at $20.63M. CVOSF’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $614.56M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.68T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $25.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLPMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCVOSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLPMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CVOSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CVOSF is a better buy in the long-term than CLPMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLPMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CVOSF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLPMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CVOSF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CLPMF and CVOSF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CLPMF (@Computer Communications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CVOSF (@Computer Communications) price change was +1.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.98%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (+1.14% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CVOSF($615M) has a higher market cap than CLPMF($20.6M). CVOSF YTD gains are higher at: 36.085 vs. CLPMF (8.100). CLPMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -4.99M vs. CVOSF (-8.04M). CVOSF has more cash in the bank: 128M vs. CLPMF (2.75M). CVOSF has less debt than CLPMF: CVOSF (7.28M) vs CLPMF (17.5M). CVOSF has higher revenues than CLPMF: CVOSF (137M) vs CLPMF (3.03M).
CLPMFCVOSFCLPMF / CVOSF
Capitalization20.6M615M3%
EBITDA-4.99M-8.04M62%
Gain YTD8.10036.08522%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue3.03M137M2%
Total Cash2.75M128M2%
Total Debt17.5M7.28M241%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLPMFCVOSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
50%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
28%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLPMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CVOSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ISRJF0.16N/A
N/A
ReGen III Corp.
AILIP66.13N/A
N/A
Ameren Illinois Company
GRPTF19.28N/A
N/A
Getlink SE
SHALF0.54N/A
N/A
Shangri-La Asia Ltd.
OMZNF0.29-0.02
-4.97%
Osisko Metals Inc.

CLPMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLPMF and GB have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLPMF and GB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLPMF
1D Price
Change %
CLPMF100%
N/A
GB - CLPMF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGL - CLPMF
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.35%
RUM - CLPMF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
SDCH - CLPMF
3%
Poorly correlated
+3.55%
CVOSF - CLPMF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CVOSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CVOSF has been loosely correlated with SPMYY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CVOSF jumps, then SPMYY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CVOSF
1D Price
Change %
CVOSF100%
N/A
SPMYY - CVOSF
56%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SPNUF - CVOSF
54%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AISP - CVOSF
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.92%
LIFX - CVOSF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DAVE - CVOSF
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.48%
More