CLPMF
Price
$0.15
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
16.66M
RUM
Price
$9.38
Change
-$0.27 (-2.80%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.03B
44 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLPMF vs RUM

Header iconCLPMF vs RUM Comparison
Open Charts CLPMF vs RUMBanner chart's image
Clip Money
Price$0.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization16.66M
Rumble
Price$9.38
Change-$0.27 (-2.80%)
Volume$2.18M
Capitalization2.03B
CLPMF vs RUM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLPMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLPMF vs. RUM commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLPMF is a Hold and RUM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CLPMF: $0.15 vs. RUM: $9.38)
Brand notoriety: CLPMF and RUM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLPMF: 187% vs. RUM: 83%
Market capitalization -- CLPMF: $16.66M vs. RUM: $2.03B
CLPMF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $16.66M. RUM’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $2.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLPMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRUM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLPMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RUM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RUM is a better buy in the long-term than CLPMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLPMF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLPMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • RUM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLPMF is a better buy in the short-term than RUM.

Price Growth

CLPMF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +0.87% price change this week, while RUM (@Packaged Software) price change was +0.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +4.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

RUM is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+4.19% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RUM($2.04B) has a higher market cap than CLPMF($16.7M). RUM (-27.902) and CLPMF (-28.298) have similar YTD gains . CLPMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -9.96M vs. RUM (-130.68M). RUM has more cash in the bank: 219M vs. CLPMF (497K). RUM has less debt than CLPMF: RUM (2.61M) vs CLPMF (5.97M). RUM has higher revenues than CLPMF: RUM (81M) vs CLPMF (56.2K).
CLPMFRUMCLPMF / RUM
Capitalization16.7M2.04B1%
EBITDA-9.96M-130.68M8%
Gain YTD-28.298-27.902101%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue56.2K81M0%
Total Cash497K219M0%
Total Debt5.97M2.61M229%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLPMFRUM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLPMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RUM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TYNPF39.37N/A
N/A
Nippon Sanso Holdings Corp.
HINOY25.34N/A
N/A
Hino Motors Ltd.
KSKGF1.40N/A
N/A
Kingsgate Consolidated Ltd.
SLRK8.98N/A
N/A
Solera National Bancorp, Inc.
FREJP19.02N/A
N/A
Freddie Mac

CLPMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLPMF and GB have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLPMF and GB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLPMF
1D Price
Change %
CLPMF100%
N/A
GB - CLPMF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FOXO - CLPMF
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.69%
TGL - CLPMF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.81%
RUM - CLPMF
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.80%
SDCH - CLPMF
3%
Poorly correlated
+15.94%
More

RUM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUM has been loosely correlated with BTDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RUM jumps, then BTDR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RUM
1D Price
Change %
RUM100%
-2.80%
BTDR - RUM
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PSQH - RUM
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.38%
EVCM - RUM
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.87%
AI - RUM
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.27%
AISP - RUM
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.20%
More