Advertisement
CLPXF vs CLPXY
To understand the difference between China Longyuan Power Group Corporation Limited - Ordinary Shares - Class H (CLPXF) vs. China Longyuan Power Group Corporation Limited - ADR (CLPXY) it is enough to know the definitions of Ordinary Shares - Class H and ADR
Ordinary Shares - Class H - The Chinese stock markets have strict restrictions on who can buy and what is available to investors for purchase. Chinese H-shares represent the shares of publicly-traded incorporated Chinese companies listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange and trade with a face value of Hong Kong dollars (HKD). Before 2007, H-shares were provided only for foreign investors. Since foreign investors trade H-shares, they have become more liquid in comparison to A-shares which represent publicly listed Chinese companies that trade on the Shenzhen and Shanghai Stock Exchanges in yuan renminbi (CNY). Thus, this resulted in A-shares being traded at a premium to H-shares of a similar company.
ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLPXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCLPXY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CLPXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- CLPXY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLPXF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLPXY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLPXF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
- CLPXY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CLPXF (@Alternative Power Generation) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CLPXY (@Alternative Power Generation) price change was -1.54% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Alternative Power Generation industry was +4.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.55%.
Reported Earning Dates
CLPXY is expected to report earnings on Mar 28, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Alternative Power Generation (+4.07% weekly)The alternative power generation industry consists of companies that operate power facilities converting non-conventional forms of energy into electricity. These energy forms are alternatives to fossil fuels, and many of them are derived from natural resources. Alternative energy forms include solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal steam. A major purpose behind using alternative energy – also called ‘clean’ energy - is to address concerns related to the more conventional fossil fuels, such as the latter’s high carbon dioxide emissions which is often considered a factor in global warming. Alternative power generation has been gaining traction in recent years, and could grow further in the future. Large organizations like Google have invested substantially in wind and solar energy-powered electricity. Some of the prominent U.S. companies operating in the alternative power generation industry includes Ormat Technologies, Inc., TerraForm Power, Inc. and NextEra Energy Partners LP.
| CLPXF | CLPXY | CLPXF / CLPXY | |
| Capitalization | 17.5B | 17.5B | 100% |
| EBITDA | 10.9B | 10.9B | 100% |
| Gain YTD | -6.721 | 13.433 | -50% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.83 | 11.20 | 106% |
| Revenue | 39.3B | 39.3B | 100% |
| Total Cash | 19.6B | 19.6B | 100% |
| Total Debt | 114B | 114B | 100% |
CLPXF | CLPXY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 37 Fair valued | 46 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 86 | 76 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 77 | 77 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 63 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 30 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CLPXF's Valuation (37) in the null industry is in the same range as CLPXY (46). This means that CLPXF’s stock grew similarly to CLPXY’s over the last 12 months.
CLPXY's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as CLPXF (86). This means that CLPXY’s stock grew similarly to CLPXF’s over the last 12 months.
CLPXY's SMR Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as CLPXF (77). This means that CLPXY’s stock grew similarly to CLPXF’s over the last 12 months.
CLPXY's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as CLPXF (59). This means that CLPXY’s stock grew similarly to CLPXF’s over the last 12 months.
CLPXF's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as CLPXY (63). This means that CLPXF’s stock grew similarly to CLPXY’s over the last 12 months.
| CLPXF | CLPXY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 33% | 3 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 36% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 73% |
Advertisement
CLPXF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CLPXF and CLPXY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLPXF and CLPXY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLPXF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLPXF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CLPXY - CLPXF | 20% Poorly correlated | -2.30% | ||
| AWSL - CLPXF | 9% Poorly correlated | -3.85% | ||
| CGKEF - CLPXF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CWEN - CLPXF | 3% Poorly correlated | +2.10% | ||
| BEPC - CLPXF | -3% Poorly correlated | +2.71% | ||
More | ||||
CLPXY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CLPXY and BEPC have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLPXY and BEPC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLPXY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLPXY | 100% | -2.30% | ||
| BEPC - CLPXY | 20% Poorly correlated | +2.71% | ||
| CLPXF - CLPXY | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WEGYF - CLPXY | 14% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RNW - CLPXY | 10% Poorly correlated | +10.84% | ||
| HTOO - CLPXY | 5% Poorly correlated | -4.21% | ||
More | ||||