CLRSF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.01 (-20.00%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
12.81M
SVMLF
Price
$0.48
Change
+$0.01 (+2.13%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
292.12M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLRSF vs SVMLF

Header iconCLRSF vs SVMLF Comparison
Open Charts CLRSF vs SVMLFBanner chart's image
CASTILE RES
Price$0.04
Change-$0.01 (-20.00%)
Volume$257
Capitalization12.81M
Sovereign Metals
Price$0.48
Change+$0.01 (+2.13%)
Volume$13.57K
Capitalization292.12M
CLRSF vs SVMLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLRSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLRSF vs. SVMLF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLRSF is a Hold and SVMLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CLRSF: $0.04 vs. SVMLF: $0.48)
Brand notoriety: CLRSF and SVMLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLRSF: 3% vs. SVMLF: 18%
Market capitalization -- CLRSF: $12.81M vs. SVMLF: $292.12M
CLRSF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $12.81M. SVMLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $292.12M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLRSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSVMLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLRSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SVMLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLRSF is a better buy in the long-term than SVMLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLRSF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVMLF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLRSF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SVMLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLRSF is a better buy in the short-term than SVMLF.

Price Growth

CLRSF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SVMLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +3.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SVMLF($292M) has a higher market cap than CLRSF($12.8M). SVMLF YTD gains are higher at: 6.015 vs. CLRSF (-17.083). CLRSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.92M vs. SVMLF (-33.22M).
CLRSFSVMLFCLRSF / SVMLF
Capitalization12.8M292M4%
EBITDA-1.92M-33.22M6%
Gain YTD-17.0836.015-284%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLRSFSVMLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
10%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
27%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
18%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
16%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLRSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PATH11.490.64
+5.90%
UiPath
PLD113.651.04
+0.92%
PROLOGIS
ALCO33.53-0.15
-0.45%
Alico
DTST4.46-0.06
-1.33%
Data Storage Corp
INVX16.82-0.44
-2.55%
Innovex International Inc

CLRSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLRSF and FRSPF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLRSF and FRSPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLRSF
1D Price
Change %
CLRSF100%
N/A
FRSPF - CLRSF
25%
Poorly correlated
-7.25%
ELMTF - CLRSF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCVNF - CLRSF
12%
Poorly correlated
+2.39%
FNICF - CLRSF
3%
Poorly correlated
+5.83%
SVMLF - CLRSF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.38%
More

SVMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SVMLF and VRRCF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SVMLF and VRRCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVMLF
1D Price
Change %
SVMLF100%
+2.38%
VRRCF - SVMLF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.54%
EULIF - SVMLF
11%
Poorly correlated
+17.50%
RSNUF - SVMLF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
METOF - SVMLF
5%
Poorly correlated
+10.63%
TCVNF - SVMLF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.39%
More