CLS
Price
$201.45
Change
+$6.71 (+3.45%)
Updated
Aug 4 closing price
Capitalization
22.4B
83 days until earnings call
HNHPF
Price
$12.02
Change
+$0.10 (+0.84%)
Updated
Aug 4 closing price
Capitalization
83.54B
9 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLS vs HNHPF

Header iconCLS vs HNHPF Comparison
Open Charts CLS vs HNHPFBanner chart's image
Celestica
Price$201.45
Change+$6.71 (+3.45%)
Volume$2.49M
Capitalization22.4B
Hon Hai Precision Industry
Price$12.02
Change+$0.10 (+0.84%)
Volume$38.64K
Capitalization83.54B
CLS vs HNHPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HNHPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLS vs. HNHPF commentary
Aug 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLS is a Hold and HNHPF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CLS: $201.45 vs. HNHPF: $12.02)
Brand notoriety: CLS and HNHPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLS: 66% vs. HNHPF: 108%
Market capitalization -- CLS: $22.4B vs. HNHPF: $83.54B
CLS [@Electronic Components] is valued at $22.4B. HNHPF’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $83.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $132.63B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $7.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHNHPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HNHPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLS is a better buy in the long-term than HNHPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HNHPF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HNHPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HNHPF is a better buy in the short-term than CLS.

Price Growth

CLS (@Electronic Components) experienced а +16.20% price change this week, while HNHPF (@Electronic Components) price change was +1.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -1.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLS is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

HNHPF is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (-1.22% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HNHPF($83.5B) has a higher market cap than CLS($22.4B). CLS has higher P/E ratio than HNHPF: CLS (43.89) vs HNHPF (14.74). CLS YTD gains are higher at: 118.256 vs. HNHPF (11.879). HNHPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 363B vs. CLS (897M). HNHPF has higher revenues than CLS: HNHPF (7.18T) vs CLS (10.6B).
CLSHNHPFCLS / HNHPF
Capitalization22.4B83.5B27%
EBITDA897M363B0%
Gain YTD118.25611.879995%
P/E Ratio43.8914.74298%
Revenue10.6B7.18T0%
Total Cash314MN/A-
Total Debt875MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLS vs HNHPF: Fundamental Ratings
CLS
HNHPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8321
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1338
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3544
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
561
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CLS's Valuation (50) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as HNHPF (50) in the null industry. This means that CLS’s stock grew similarly to HNHPF’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as HNHPF (38) in the null industry. This means that CLS’s stock grew similarly to HNHPF’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's SMR Rating (100) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as HNHPF (100) in the null industry. This means that CLS’s stock grew similarly to HNHPF’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as HNHPF (44) in the null industry. This means that CLS’s stock grew similarly to HNHPF’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HNHPF (61) in the null industry. This means that CLS’s stock grew somewhat faster than HNHPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSHNHPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HNHPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FXY62.641.56
+2.55%
Invesco CurrencyShares® Japanese Yen
NUHY21.550.08
+0.35%
Nuveen ESG High Yield Corporate Bd ETF
NBFC51.320.03
+0.06%
Neuberger Berman Flexible Credit Inc ETF
PST22.49-0.03
-0.15%
ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury
NUV8.58-0.04
-0.46%
Nuveen Municipal Value Fund

CLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLS has been closely correlated with FLEX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLS jumps, then FLEX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLS
1D Price
Change %
CLS100%
+3.45%
FLEX - CLS
74%
Closely correlated
+2.87%
APH - CLS
69%
Closely correlated
+4.14%
GLW - CLS
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.32%
SANM - CLS
64%
Loosely correlated
+5.24%
FN - CLS
63%
Loosely correlated
+4.56%
More

HNHPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HNHPF and OLED have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HNHPF and OLED's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HNHPF
1D Price
Change %
HNHPF100%
+0.84%
OLED - HNHPF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.18%
APH - HNHPF
29%
Poorly correlated
+4.14%
IBIDF - HNHPF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLS - HNHPF
28%
Poorly correlated
+3.45%
AUOTY - HNHPF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.23%
More