Ad is loading...
CLS
Price
$82.18
Change
+$1.70 (+2.11%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
72 days until earnings call
HNHPF
Price
$12.60
Change
-$0.27 (-2.10%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
114 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CLS vs HNHPF

Header iconCLS vs HNHPF Comparison
Open Charts CLS vs HNHPFBanner chart's image
Celestica
Price$82.18
Change+$1.70 (+2.11%)
Volume$3.18M
CapitalizationN/A
Hon Hai Precision Industry
Price$12.60
Change-$0.27 (-2.10%)
Volume$29.44K
CapitalizationN/A
CLS vs HNHPF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
HNHPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLS vs. HNHPF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLS is a Sell and HNHPF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CLS: $82.18 vs. HNHPF: $12.60)
Brand notoriety: CLS and HNHPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLS: 141% vs. HNHPF: 70%
Market capitalization -- CLS: $9.58B vs. HNHPF: $88.31B
CLS [@Electronic Components] is valued at $9.58B. HNHPF’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $88.31B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $88.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $5.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHNHPF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CLS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HNHPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HNHPF is a better buy in the long-term than CLS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HNHPF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HNHPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLS is a better buy in the short-term than HNHPF.

Price Growth

CLS (@Electronic Components) experienced а -4.27% price change this week, while HNHPF (@Electronic Components) price change was -5.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -3.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLS is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.

HNHPF is expected to report earnings on Mar 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (-3.14% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HNHPF($88.3B) has a higher market cap than CLS($9.58B). CLS has higher P/E ratio than HNHPF: CLS (26.01) vs HNHPF (18.83). CLS YTD gains are higher at: 180.669 vs. HNHPF (92.816). HNHPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 342B vs. CLS (710M). HNHPF has more cash in the bank: 1.26T vs. CLS (398M). CLS has less debt than HNHPF: CLS (941M) vs HNHPF (878B). HNHPF has higher revenues than CLS: HNHPF (6.27T) vs CLS (9.24B).
CLSHNHPFCLS / HNHPF
Capitalization9.58B88.3B11%
EBITDA710M342B0%
Gain YTD180.66992.816195%
P/E Ratio26.0118.83138%
Revenue9.24B6.27T0%
Total Cash398M1.26T0%
Total Debt941M878B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLS vs HNHPF: Fundamental Ratings
CLS
HNHPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9350
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
512
SMR RATING
1..100
4464
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3540
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2040
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5049

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HNHPF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLS (71) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that HNHPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLS’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as HNHPF (12) in the null industry. This means that CLS’s stock grew similarly to HNHPF’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's SMR Rating (44) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as HNHPF (64) in the null industry. This means that CLS’s stock grew similarly to HNHPF’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as HNHPF (40) in the null industry. This means that CLS’s stock grew similarly to HNHPF’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as HNHPF (40) in the null industry. This means that CLS’s stock grew similarly to HNHPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSHNHPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
HNHPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FXO56.530.14
+0.25%
First Trust Financials AlphaDEX® ETF
AMNA53.29N/A
N/A
ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy ETN
DDEC39.98-0.02
-0.05%
FT Cboe Vest US Equity Dp Bfr ETF Dec
JULJ25.09-0.05
-0.18%
Innovator Premium Income 30 Bar ETF -Jul
MGK331.20-7.31
-2.16%
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF

HNHPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HNHPF and OLED have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HNHPF and OLED's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HNHPF
1D Price
Change %
HNHPF100%
-2.10%
OLED - HNHPF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.47%
APH - HNHPF
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.80%
IBIDF - HNHPF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLS - HNHPF
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.11%
AUOTY - HNHPF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.33%
More