It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileREFR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while REFR’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
CLS (@Electronic Components) experienced а -9.23% price change this week, while REFR (@Electronic Components) price change was -5.91% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -4.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.77%.
CLS is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2024.
REFR is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2024.
The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.
CLS | REFR | CLS / REFR | |
Capitalization | 4.89B | 70.1M | 6,973% |
EBITDA | 681M | -1.44M | -47,441% |
Gain YTD | 56.762 | 104.950 | 54% |
P/E Ratio | 13.41 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 8.79B | 1.28M | 686,865% |
Total Cash | 434M | 1.91M | 22,758% |
Total Debt | 952M | 164K | 580,488% |
CLS | REFR | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 69 | 84 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 59 Fair valued | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 45 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CLS's Valuation (59) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as REFR (90) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that CLS’s stock grew similarly to REFR’s over the last 12 months.
CLS's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Electronic Components industry is significantly better than the same rating for REFR (100) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that CLS’s stock grew significantly faster than REFR’s over the last 12 months.
CLS's SMR Rating (45) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for REFR (97) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that CLS’s stock grew somewhat faster than REFR’s over the last 12 months.
REFR's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as CLS (46) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that REFR’s stock grew similarly to CLS’s over the last 12 months.
CLS's P/E Growth Rating (74) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as REFR (100) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that CLS’s stock grew similarly to REFR’s over the last 12 months.
CLS | REFR | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago83% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 3 days ago81% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago67% | 3 days ago82% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago64% | 3 days ago83% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago66% | 3 days ago85% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago67% | 3 days ago84% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago76% | 20 days ago80% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago71% | 9 days ago86% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago73% | 3 days ago84% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago58% | 3 days ago84% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
TCHI | 15.05 | 0.09 | +0.59% |
iShares MSCI China Multisector Tech ETF | |||
AVNM | 57.37 | 0.08 | +0.14% |
Avantis All International Mkts Eq ETF | |||
UTWO | 48.58 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
US Treasury 2 Year Note ETF | |||
DEM | 42.90 | -0.01 | -0.02% |
WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Div ETF | |||
QWLD | 125.57 | -0.72 | -0.57% |
SPDR® MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF |
A.I.dvisor tells us that REFR and MEI have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that REFR and MEI's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To REFR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
REFR | 100% | N/A | ||
MEI - REFR | 22% Poorly correlated | +2.78% | ||
IMTE - REFR | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.11% | ||
OUST - REFR | 20% Poorly correlated | -2.65% | ||
LFUS - REFR | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.48% | ||
CLS - REFR | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.61% | ||
More |