CLS
Price
$69.05
Change
-$13.31 (-16.16%)
Updated
Apr 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.89B
19 days until earnings call
SGMA
Price
$1.24
Change
-$0.12 (-8.82%)
Updated
Apr 3, 04:49 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.47M
Ad is loading...

CLS vs SGMA

Header iconCLS vs SGMA Comparison
Open Charts CLS vs SGMABanner chart's image
Celestica
Price$69.05
Change-$13.31 (-16.16%)
Volume$45.91K
Capitalization7.89B
SigmaTron International
Price$1.24
Change-$0.12 (-8.82%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization7.47M
CLS vs SGMA Comparison Chart
Loading...
CLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SGMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLS vs. SGMA commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLS is a Hold and SGMA is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CLS: $69.19 vs. SGMA: $1.22)
Brand notoriety: CLS and SGMA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLS: 139% vs. SGMA: 38%
Market capitalization -- CLS: $7.89B vs. SGMA: $7.47M
CLS [@Electronic Components] is valued at $7.89B. SGMA’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $7.47M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $82.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSGMA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SGMA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLS is a better buy in the long-term than SGMA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SGMA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SGMA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SGMA is a better buy in the short-term than CLS.

Price Growth

CLS (@Electronic Components) experienced а -18.01% price change this week, while SGMA (@Electronic Components) price change was -5.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -7.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.91%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLS is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

SGMA is expected to report earnings on Dec 23, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (-7.18% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLS($7.89B) has a higher market cap than SGMA($7.47M). CLS has higher P/E ratio than SGMA: CLS (19.17) vs SGMA (2.87). CLS YTD gains are higher at: -10.780 vs. SGMA (-31.461). CLS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 736M vs. SGMA (7.48M). CLS has more cash in the bank: 423M vs. SGMA (3.98M). SGMA has less debt than CLS: SGMA (77.1M) vs CLS (797M). CLS has higher revenues than SGMA: CLS (9.65B) vs SGMA (337M).
CLSSGMACLS / SGMA
Capitalization7.89B7.47M105,692%
EBITDA736M7.48M9,842%
Gain YTD-10.780-31.46134%
P/E Ratio19.172.87668%
Revenue9.65B337M2,862%
Total Cash423M3.98M10,620%
Total Debt797M77.1M1,034%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLS vs SGMA: Fundamental Ratings
CLS
SGMA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8014
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
31100
SMR RATING
1..100
4095
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4888
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4854
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SGMA's Valuation (37) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLS (71). This means that SGMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLS’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Electronic Components industry is significantly better than the same rating for SGMA (100). This means that CLS’s stock grew significantly faster than SGMA’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's SMR Rating (40) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SGMA (95). This means that CLS’s stock grew somewhat faster than SGMA’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SGMA (88). This means that CLS’s stock grew somewhat faster than SGMA’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as SGMA (54). This means that CLS’s stock grew similarly to SGMA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSSGMA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SGMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PEJ49.761.06
+2.18%
Invesco Dynamic Leisure and Entmnt ETF
IWP120.572.03
+1.71%
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
ILCV81.830.45
+0.55%
iShares Morningstar Value ETF
FDRV13.190.05
+0.37%
Fidelity Elctrc Vhcls & Ftr Trnsptn ETF
MSFO16.05N/A
N/A
YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF

CLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLS has been closely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLS jumps, then APH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLS
1D Price
Change %
CLS100%
+4.16%
APH - CLS
70%
Closely correlated
+2.77%
FLEX - CLS
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.11%
FN - CLS
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.47%
JBL - CLS
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.71%
SANM - CLS
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.93%
More

SGMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SGMA and LFUS have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SGMA and LFUS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGMA
1D Price
Change %
SGMA100%
-10.29%
LFUS - SGMA
25%
Poorly correlated
-17.35%
CLS - SGMA
23%
Poorly correlated
-15.98%
BHE - SGMA
22%
Poorly correlated
-11.96%
TTMI - SGMA
22%
Poorly correlated
-10.91%
MEI - SGMA
22%
Poorly correlated
-10.67%
More