Ad is loading...
CLS
Price
$82.18
Change
+$1.70 (+2.11%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
72 days until earnings call
TTDKF
Price
$13.31
Change
-$0.03 (-0.22%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

CLS vs TTDKF

Header iconCLS vs TTDKF Comparison
Open Charts CLS vs TTDKFBanner chart's image
Celestica
Price$82.18
Change+$1.70 (+2.11%)
Volume$3.18M
CapitalizationN/A
TDK
Price$13.31
Change-$0.03 (-0.22%)
Volume$7.08K
CapitalizationN/A
CLS vs TTDKF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLS vs. TTDKF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLS is a Sell and TTDKF is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CLS: $82.18 vs. TTDKF: $13.31)
Brand notoriety: CLS and TTDKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLS: 141% vs. TTDKF: 126%
Market capitalization -- CLS: $9.58B vs. TTDKF: $24.11B
CLS [@Electronic Components] is valued at $9.58B. TTDKF’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $24.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $88.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $5.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTTDKF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TTDKF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLS is a better buy in the long-term than TTDKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CLS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CLS (@Electronic Components) experienced а -4.27% price change this week, while TTDKF (@Electronic Components) price change was +6.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -3.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLS is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (-3.14% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TTDKF($24.1B) has a higher market cap than CLS($9.58B). TTDKF has higher P/E ratio than CLS: TTDKF (29.31) vs CLS (26.01). CLS YTD gains are higher at: 180.669 vs. TTDKF (38.874). TTDKF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 400B vs. CLS (710M). TTDKF has higher revenues than CLS: TTDKF (2.1T) vs CLS (9.24B).
CLSTTDKFCLS / TTDKF
Capitalization9.58B24.1B40%
EBITDA710M400B0%
Gain YTD180.66938.874465%
P/E Ratio26.0129.3189%
Revenue9.24B2.1T0%
Total Cash398MN/A-
Total Debt941MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLS vs TTDKF: Fundamental Ratings
CLS
TTDKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9350
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
561
SMR RATING
1..100
4473
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3541
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2064
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TTDKF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLS (71) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that TTDKF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLS’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TTDKF (61) in the null industry. This means that CLS’s stock grew somewhat faster than TTDKF’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's SMR Rating (44) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as TTDKF (73) in the null industry. This means that CLS’s stock grew similarly to TTDKF’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as TTDKF (41) in the null industry. This means that CLS’s stock grew similarly to TTDKF’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TTDKF (64) in the null industry. This means that CLS’s stock grew somewhat faster than TTDKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FXO56.530.14
+0.25%
First Trust Financials AlphaDEX® ETF
AMNA53.29N/A
N/A
ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy ETN
DDEC39.98-0.02
-0.05%
FT Cboe Vest US Equity Dp Bfr ETF Dec
JULJ25.09-0.05
-0.18%
Innovator Premium Income 30 Bar ETF -Jul
MGK331.20-7.31
-2.16%
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF

CLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLS has been loosely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLS jumps, then APH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLS
1D Price
Change %
CLS100%
+2.11%
APH - CLS
63%
Loosely correlated
-2.80%
FN - CLS
56%
Loosely correlated
-6.81%
FLEX - CLS
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.17%
BHE - CLS
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.69%
JBL - CLS
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
More

TTDKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TTDKF and MRAAY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TTDKF and MRAAY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TTDKF
1D Price
Change %
TTDKF100%
-0.24%
MRAAY - TTDKF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
CLS - TTDKF
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.11%
SOTGY - TTDKF
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.56%
TYOYY - TTDKF
23%
Poorly correlated
+5.77%
OLED - TTDKF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.47%
More