CLS
Price
$119.38
Change
-$1.88 (-1.55%)
Updated
Jun 4, 01:05 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
13.95B
54 days until earnings call
TTDKF
Price
$10.35
Change
-$0.69 (-6.25%)
Updated
Jun 3 closing price
Capitalization
19.89B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLS vs TTDKF

Header iconCLS vs TTDKF Comparison
Open Charts CLS vs TTDKFBanner chart's image
Celestica
Price$119.38
Change-$1.88 (-1.55%)
Volume$1.25K
Capitalization13.95B
TDK
Price$10.35
Change-$0.69 (-6.25%)
Volume$5.07K
Capitalization19.89B
CLS vs TTDKF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TTDKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLS vs. TTDKF commentary
Jun 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLS is a StrongBuy and TTDKF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CLS: $121.26 vs. TTDKF: $10.35)
Brand notoriety: CLS and TTDKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLS: 78% vs. TTDKF: 24%
Market capitalization -- CLS: $13.95B vs. TTDKF: $19.89B
CLS [@Electronic Components] is valued at $13.95B. TTDKF’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $19.89B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $110.9B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $6.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTTDKF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CLS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TTDKF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLS is a better buy in the long-term than TTDKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTDKF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TTDKF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLS is a better buy in the short-term than TTDKF.

Price Growth

CLS (@Electronic Components) experienced а +2.00% price change this week, while TTDKF (@Electronic Components) price change was -6.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLS is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+1.17% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TTDKF($19.9B) has a higher market cap than CLS($14B). CLS has higher P/E ratio than TTDKF: CLS (33.87) vs TTDKF (16.92). CLS YTD gains are higher at: 31.376 vs. TTDKF (-13.606). TTDKF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 446B vs. CLS (746M). TTDKF has more cash in the bank: 752B vs. CLS (303M). CLS has less debt than TTDKF: CLS (942M) vs TTDKF (687B). TTDKF has higher revenues than CLS: TTDKF (2.13T) vs CLS (10.1B).
CLSTTDKFCLS / TTDKF
Capitalization14B19.9B70%
EBITDA746M446B0%
Gain YTD31.376-13.606-231%
P/E Ratio33.8716.92200%
Revenue10.1B2.13T0%
Total Cash303M752B0%
Total Debt942M687B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLS vs TTDKF: Fundamental Ratings
CLS
TTDKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8316
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2774
SMR RATING
1..100
382
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3746
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1387
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a14

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TTDKF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLS (78) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that TTDKF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLS’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TTDKF (74) in the null industry. This means that CLS’s stock grew somewhat faster than TTDKF’s over the last 12 months.

TTDKF's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLS (38) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that TTDKF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLS’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as TTDKF (46) in the null industry. This means that CLS’s stock grew similarly to TTDKF’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Electronic Components industry is significantly better than the same rating for TTDKF (87) in the null industry. This means that CLS’s stock grew significantly faster than TTDKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSTTDKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TTDKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RNPEX65.830.01
+0.02%
American Funds New Perspective R4
MREFX16.98N/A
N/A
BlackRock International Select Eq R
WRGCX6.42N/A
N/A
Macquarie Small Cap Growth C
FGRCX25.97N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock C
CCGSX25.19N/A
N/A
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth Inv

TTDKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TTDKF and MRAAY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TTDKF and MRAAY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TTDKF
1D Price
Change %
TTDKF100%
-6.27%
MRAAY - TTDKF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.78%
CLS - TTDKF
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.96%
SOTGY - TTDKF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
TYOYY - TTDKF
23%
Poorly correlated
+7.18%
OLED - TTDKF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.53%
More