CLS
Price
$148.74
Change
+$4.90 (+3.41%)
Updated
Jun 25, 12:53 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
16.52B
33 days until earnings call
TTDKF
Price
$9.92
Change
-$0.41 (-3.97%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
20.31B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLS vs TTDKF

Header iconCLS vs TTDKF Comparison
Open Charts CLS vs TTDKFBanner chart's image
Celestica
Price$148.74
Change+$4.90 (+3.41%)
Volume$3.33K
Capitalization16.52B
TDK
Price$9.92
Change-$0.41 (-3.97%)
Volume$2.01K
Capitalization20.31B
CLS vs TTDKF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TTDKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLS vs. TTDKF commentary
Jun 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLS is a StrongBuy and TTDKF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 25, 2025
Stock price -- (CLS: $143.84 vs. TTDKF: $9.92)
Brand notoriety: CLS and TTDKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLS: 90% vs. TTDKF: 19%
Market capitalization -- CLS: $16.52B vs. TTDKF: $20.31B
CLS [@Electronic Components] is valued at $16.52B. TTDKF’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $20.31B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $115.88B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $6.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTTDKF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CLS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TTDKF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLS is a better buy in the long-term than TTDKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTDKF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TTDKF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLS is a better buy in the short-term than TTDKF.

Price Growth

CLS (@Electronic Components) experienced а +8.82% price change this week, while TTDKF (@Electronic Components) price change was +2.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLS is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+1.09% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TTDKF($20.3B) has a higher market cap than CLS($16.5B). CLS has higher P/E ratio than TTDKF: CLS (40.18) vs TTDKF (16.49). CLS YTD gains are higher at: 55.840 vs. TTDKF (-17.179). TTDKF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 446B vs. CLS (746M). TTDKF has more cash in the bank: 752B vs. CLS (303M). CLS has less debt than TTDKF: CLS (942M) vs TTDKF (687B). TTDKF has higher revenues than CLS: TTDKF (2.13T) vs CLS (10.1B).
CLSTTDKFCLS / TTDKF
Capitalization16.5B20.3B81%
EBITDA746M446B0%
Gain YTD55.840-17.179-325%
P/E Ratio40.1816.49244%
Revenue10.1B2.13T0%
Total Cash303M752B0%
Total Debt942M687B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLS vs TTDKF: Fundamental Ratings
CLS
TTDKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1715
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2475
SMR RATING
1..100
383
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3648
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1192
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TTDKF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLS (79) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that TTDKF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLS’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TTDKF (75) in the null industry. This means that CLS’s stock grew somewhat faster than TTDKF’s over the last 12 months.

TTDKF's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLS (38) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that TTDKF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLS’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as TTDKF (48) in the null industry. This means that CLS’s stock grew similarly to TTDKF’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Electronic Components industry is significantly better than the same rating for TTDKF (92) in the null industry. This means that CLS’s stock grew significantly faster than TTDKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSTTDKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TTDKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSBC58.240.86
+1.50%
Great Southern Bancorp
EZGO0.33N/A
+1.26%
EZGO Technologies Ltd
TPL1059.949.94
+0.95%
Texas Pacific Land Corp
ARLP25.54-0.23
-0.89%
Alliance Resource Partners LP
MVO5.78-0.17
-2.86%
MV Oil Trust

CLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLS has been closely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLS jumps, then APH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLS
1D Price
Change %
CLS100%
+5.50%
APH - CLS
73%
Closely correlated
+0.58%
FLEX - CLS
70%
Closely correlated
+3.37%
FN - CLS
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.46%
JBL - CLS
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.73%
SANM - CLS
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.12%
More

TTDKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TTDKF and MRAAY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TTDKF and MRAAY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TTDKF
1D Price
Change %
TTDKF100%
-3.95%
MRAAY - TTDKF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.56%
CLS - TTDKF
26%
Poorly correlated
+5.50%
SOTGY - TTDKF
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.34%
TYOYY - TTDKF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.87%
OLED - TTDKF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.29%
More