It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLSD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSPRO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLSD’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SPRO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CLSD (@Biotechnology) experienced а -13.16% price change this week, while SPRO (@Biotechnology) price change was -10.61% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was -8.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.16%.
CLSD is expected to report earnings on Mar 18, 2025.
SPRO is expected to report earnings on Mar 13, 2025.
Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.
CLSD | SPRO | CLSD / SPRO | |
Capitalization | 74M | 63.8M | 116% |
EBITDA | -23.71M | 19.6M | -121% |
Gain YTD | -15.385 | -19.728 | 78% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 3.47 | - |
Revenue | 7.52M | 105M | 7% |
Total Cash | 29.4M | 63.5M | 46% |
Total Debt | 863K | 4.94M | 17% |
CLSD | SPRO | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 25 | 5 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 90 Overvalued | 27 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 97 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 38 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 85 | 47 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 45 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SPRO's Valuation (27) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLSD (90). This means that SPRO’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLSD’s over the last 12 months.
CLSD's Profit vs Risk Rating (97) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as SPRO (100). This means that CLSD’s stock grew similarly to SPRO’s over the last 12 months.
SPRO's SMR Rating (38) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLSD (100). This means that SPRO’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLSD’s over the last 12 months.
SPRO's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as CLSD (62). This means that SPRO’s stock grew similarly to CLSD’s over the last 12 months.
SPRO's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLSD (85). This means that SPRO’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLSD’s over the last 12 months.
CLSD | SPRO | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago67% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago76% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago76% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% | 3 days ago87% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% | 3 days ago89% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago83% | 7 days ago73% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago89% | 3 days ago88% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago87% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 3 days ago86% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CLSD and AMLX have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLSD and AMLX's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CLSD | 100% | -5.71% | ||
AMLX - CLSD | 32% Poorly correlated | -5.18% | ||
INBX - CLSD | 28% Poorly correlated | -3.49% | ||
IKNA - CLSD | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.17% | ||
VCYT - CLSD | 27% Poorly correlated | -2.97% | ||
SPRO - CLSD | 26% Poorly correlated | -5.60% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPRO has been loosely correlated with LXRX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SPRO jumps, then LXRX could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPRO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SPRO | 100% | -5.60% | ||
LXRX - SPRO | 39% Loosely correlated | -8.00% | ||
ABOS - SPRO | 34% Loosely correlated | -8.05% | ||
XNCR - SPRO | 33% Loosely correlated | -1.83% | ||
ALLO - SPRO | 32% Poorly correlated | -7.72% | ||
TECH - SPRO | 32% Poorly correlated | -6.85% | ||
More |