Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLSE vs DFND
CLSE vs DFND Comparison
Open Charts CLSE vs DFND
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
Price$25.78
Change+$0.04 (+0.16%)
Volume$1.49K
Net Assets219.77M
Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF
Price$43.10
Change-$0.54 (-1.24%)
Volume$150
Net Assets10.07M
CLSE vs DFND Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLSE vs. DFND commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSE is a Hold and DFND is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSE has more net assets: 220M vs. DFND (10.1M). CLSE has a higher annual dividend yield than DFND: CLSE (12.353) vs DFND (11.301). CLSE was incepted earlier than DFND: CLSE (16 years) vs DFND (10 years). CLSE (1.44) has a lower expense ratio than DFND (1.75). CLSE has a higher turnover DFND (115.00) vs DFND (115.00).
| CLSE | DFND | CLSE / DFND | |
| Gain YTD | 12.353 | 11.301 | 109% |
| Net Assets | 220M | 10.1M | 2,178% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.75 | 82% |
| Turnover | 225.05 | 115.00 | 196% |
| Yield | 0.82 | 0.96 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CLSE | DFND | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 86% | 6 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 63% | 9 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 7 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CLSE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSE has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSE jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSE | 100% | -0.39% | ||
| MTZ - CLSE | 74% Closely correlated | -1.76% | ||
| VRT - CLSE | 72% Closely correlated | -2.41% | ||
| EME - CLSE | 71% Closely correlated | +0.46% | ||
| FIX - CLSE | 70% Closely correlated | -1.08% | ||
| STRL - CLSE | 69% Closely correlated | -1.19% | ||
More | ||||
DFND and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DFND and ADI have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DFND and ADI's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DFND | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DFND | 100% | N/A | ||
| ADI - DFND | 18% Poorly correlated | -3.61% | ||
| PWR - DFND | 17% Poorly correlated | -1.47% | ||
| RMD - DFND | 16% Poorly correlated | +0.68% | ||
| AMAT - DFND | 16% Poorly correlated | -5.52% | ||
| KLAC - DFND | 16% Poorly correlated | -4.82% | ||
More | ||||