Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLSE vs FFLS
CLSE vs FFLS Comparison
Open Charts CLSE vs FFLS
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
Price$23.01
Change+$0.16 (+0.70%)
Volume$15.68K
Net Assets183.42M
Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Price$25.08
Change+$0.19 (+0.76%)
Volume$8.93K
Net Assets39.88M
CLSE vs FFLS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLSE vs. FFLS commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSE is a StrongBuy and FFLS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSE has more net assets: 183M vs. FFLS (39.9M). FFLS has a higher annual dividend yield than CLSE: FFLS (8.952) vs CLSE (0.436). CLSE was incepted earlier than FFLS: CLSE (15 years) vs FFLS (2 years). FFLS (1.24) has a lower expense ratio than CLSE (1.44). CLSE has a higher turnover FFLS (88.00) vs FFLS (88.00).
| CLSE | FFLS | CLSE / FFLS | |
| Gain YTD | 0.436 | 8.952 | 5% |
| Net Assets | 183M | 39.9M | 459% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.24 | 116% |
| Turnover | 225.05 | 88.00 | 256% |
| Yield | 0.93 | 0.16 | 571% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CLSE | FFLS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 17 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CLSE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSE has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSE jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSE | 100% | +0.68% | ||
| MTZ - CLSE | 74% Closely correlated | +2.62% | ||
| MRVL - CLSE | 69% Closely correlated | +4.90% | ||
| PRIM - CLSE | 69% Closely correlated | +3.03% | ||
| JCI - CLSE | 68% Closely correlated | +1.44% | ||
| COHR - CLSE | 68% Closely correlated | +0.11% | ||
More | ||||
FFLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLS has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFLS jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLS | 100% | +0.77% | ||
| NVDA - FFLS | 67% Closely correlated | +1.24% | ||
| MU - FFLS | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.14% | ||
| META - FFLS | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.91% | ||
| DDOG - FFLS | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| ASML - FFLS | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.70% | ||
More | ||||