Ad is loading...
CLSE vs FFLS
CLSE vs FFLS Comparison
Open Charts CLSE vs FFLS
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
Price$23.80
Change+$0.25 (+1.06%)
Volume$89.25K
Net Assets251.6M
Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Price$23.32
Change+$0.07 (+0.30%)
Volume$2.22K
Net Assets34.39M
CLSE vs FFLS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLSE vs. FFLS commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSE is a Hold and FFLS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSE has more net assets: 252M vs. FFLS (34.4M). CLSE has a higher annual dividend yield than FFLS: CLSE (3.885) vs FFLS (1.303). CLSE was incepted earlier than FFLS: CLSE (15 years) vs FFLS (2 years). CLSE has a higher turnover FFLS (56.00) vs FFLS (56.00).
| CLSE | FFLS | CLSE / FFLS | |
| Gain YTD | 3.885 | 1.303 | 298% |
| Net Assets | 252M | 34.4M | 733% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 283.70 | 56.00 | 507% |
| Yield | 1.01 | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CLSE | FFLS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 90% | 12 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 67% | 12 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 89% | 12 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 68% | 12 days ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 87% | 14 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 60% | 12 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CLSE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSE has been loosely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLSE jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSE | 100% | +1.06% | ||
| CDNS - CLSE | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.24% | ||
| MSFT - CLSE | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.05% | ||
| VRT - CLSE | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.48% | ||
| ANET - CLSE | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.54% | ||
| AMAT - CLSE | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.99% | ||
More | ||||
FFLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLS has been loosely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFLS jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLS | 100% | +0.28% | ||
| NVDA - FFLS | 63% Loosely correlated | +3.10% | ||
| ASML - FFLS | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| MU - FFLS | 54% Loosely correlated | +3.07% | ||
| PWR - FFLS | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.38% | ||
| NFLX - FFLS | 50% Loosely correlated | +1.87% | ||
More | ||||