Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLSE vs FFLS
CLSE vs FFLS Comparison
Open Charts CLSE vs FFLS
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
Price$24.57
Change+$0.14 (+0.57%)
Volume$982
Net Assets197.84M
Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Price$25.48
Change-$0.11 (-0.43%)
Volume$137
Net Assets41.43M
CLSE vs FFLS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLSE vs. FFLS commentary
Aug 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSE is a Hold and FFLS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSE has more net assets: 198M vs. FFLS (41.4M). FFLS has a higher annual dividend yield than CLSE: FFLS (11.164) vs CLSE (6.635). CLSE was incepted earlier than FFLS: CLSE (16 years) vs FFLS (2 years). FFLS (1.24) has a lower expense ratio than CLSE (1.44). CLSE has a higher turnover FFLS (88.00) vs FFLS (88.00).
| CLSE | FFLS | CLSE / FFLS | |
| Gain YTD | 6.635 | 11.164 | 59% |
| Net Assets | 198M | 41.4M | 478% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.24 | 116% |
| Turnover | 225.05 | 88.00 | 256% |
| Yield | 0.88 | 0.16 | 566% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CLSE | FFLS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | 4 days ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 48% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 50% | 4 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 64% | 6 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CLSE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSE has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSE jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSE | 100% | +0.37% | ||
| MTZ - CLSE | 75% Closely correlated | +1.90% | ||
| VRT - CLSE | 74% Closely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| EME - CLSE | 71% Closely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| FIX - CLSE | 70% Closely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| STRL - CLSE | 69% Closely correlated | +0.56% | ||
More | ||||
FFLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLS has been loosely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFLS jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLS | 100% | +0.79% | ||
| NVDA - FFLS | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.72% | ||
| META - FFLS | 59% Loosely correlated | +2.12% | ||
| DASH - FFLS | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| MU - FFLS | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.63% | ||
| CRM - FFLS | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.00% | ||
More | ||||