Ad is loading...
CLSE vs FFLS
CLSE vs FFLS Comparison
Open Charts CLSE vs FFLS
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
Price$22.10
Change-$0.27 (-1.21%)
Volume$271
Net Assets263.28M
Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Price$24.19
Change-$0.13 (-0.53%)
Volume$7.7K
Net Assets36.49M
CLSE vs FFLS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLSE vs. FFLS commentary
Mar 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSE is a StrongBuy and FFLS is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSE has more net assets: 263M vs. FFLS (36.5M). FFLS has a higher annual dividend yield than CLSE: FFLS (5.083) vs CLSE (-2.357). CLSE was incepted earlier than FFLS: CLSE (15 years) vs FFLS (2 years). CLSE has a higher turnover FFLS (56.00) vs FFLS (56.00).
| CLSE | FFLS | CLSE / FFLS | |
| Gain YTD | -2.357 | 5.083 | -46% |
| Net Assets | 263M | 36.5M | 721% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 283.70 | 56.00 | 507% |
| Yield | 1.01 | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CLSE | FFLS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 85% | 15 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 62% | 8 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CLSE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSE has been loosely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLSE jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSE | 100% | -1.41% | ||
| CDNS - CLSE | 65% Loosely correlated | -3.50% | ||
| MSFT - CLSE | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.14% | ||
| VRT - CLSE | 61% Loosely correlated | -10.26% | ||
| ANET - CLSE | 59% Loosely correlated | -7.57% | ||
| KNF - CLSE | 59% Loosely correlated | -5.23% | ||
More | ||||
FFLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLS has been loosely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFLS jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLS | 100% | -0.51% | ||
| NVDA - FFLS | 61% Loosely correlated | -8.69% | ||
| MU - FFLS | 56% Loosely correlated | -3.30% | ||
| ASML - FFLS | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.30% | ||
| GOOGL - FFLS | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.92% | ||
| NFLX - FFLS | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.70% | ||
More | ||||