Ad is loading...
CLSE vs FFLS
CLSE vs FFLS Comparison
Open Charts CLSE vs FFLS
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
Price$23.19
Change-$0.30 (-1.28%)
Volume$1.75K
CapitalizationN/A
Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Price$23.87
Change-$0.23 (-0.95%)
Volume$226
CapitalizationN/A
CLSE vs FFLS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLSE vs. FFLS commentary
Dec 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSE is a Hold and FFLS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSE has more net assets: 221M vs. FFLS (35.6M). CLSE has a higher annual dividend yield than FFLS: CLSE (38.974) vs FFLS (19.261). CLSE was incepted earlier than FFLS: CLSE (15 years) vs FFLS (2 years). CLSE has a higher turnover FFLS (56.00) vs FFLS (56.00).
| CLSE | FFLS | CLSE / FFLS | |
| Gain YTD | 38.974 | 19.261 | 202% |
| Net Assets | 221M | 35.6M | 621% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 283.70 | 56.00 | 507% |
| Yield | 1.01 | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CLSE | FFLS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 59% | 6 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CLSE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSE has been loosely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLSE jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSE | 100% | -1.59% | ||
| CDNS - CLSE | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| MSFT - CLSE | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| VRT - CLSE | 61% Loosely correlated | -4.19% | ||
| ANET - CLSE | 59% Loosely correlated | -3.07% | ||
| AMAT - CLSE | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
More | ||||
FFLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLS has been loosely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFLS jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLS | 100% | +0.11% | ||
| NVDA - FFLS | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.22% | ||
| ASML - FFLS | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.77% | ||
| MU - FFLS | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| PWR - FFLS | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.77% | ||
| NFLX - FFLS | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.21% | ||
More | ||||