Ad is loading...
CLSE vs FFLS
CLSE vs FFLS Comparison
Open Charts CLSE vs FFLS
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
Price$20.15
Change-$0.95 (-4.50%)
Volume$265
Net Assets171.13M
Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Price$22.79
Change-$0.28 (-1.21%)
Volume$748
Net Assets35.51M
CLSE vs FFLS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLSE vs. FFLS commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSE is a Hold and FFLS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSE has more net assets: 171M vs. FFLS (35.5M). FFLS has a higher annual dividend yield than CLSE: FFLS (0.195) vs CLSE (-7.900). CLSE was incepted earlier than FFLS: CLSE (15 years) vs FFLS (2 years). FFLS (1.24) has a lower expense ratio than CLSE (1.55). CLSE has a higher turnover FFLS (88.00) vs FFLS (88.00).
| CLSE | FFLS | CLSE / FFLS | |
| Gain YTD | -7.900 | 0.195 | -4,042% |
| Net Assets | 171M | 35.5M | 482% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.55 | 1.24 | 125% |
| Turnover | 225.05 | 88.00 | 256% |
| Yield | 0.98 | 0.17 | 574% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CLSE | FFLS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 48% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 11 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CLSE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSE has been loosely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLSE jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSE | 100% | -3.39% | ||
| CDNS - CLSE | 65% Loosely correlated | -6.05% | ||
| MSFT - CLSE | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.36% | ||
| KNF - CLSE | 61% Loosely correlated | -4.80% | ||
| VRT - CLSE | 61% Loosely correlated | -12.50% | ||
| ANET - CLSE | 59% Loosely correlated | -11.09% | ||
More | ||||
FFLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLS has been loosely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFLS jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLS | 100% | -1.43% | ||
| NVDA - FFLS | 63% Loosely correlated | -7.81% | ||
| MU - FFLS | 58% Loosely correlated | -16.09% | ||
| ASML - FFLS | 54% Loosely correlated | -6.84% | ||
| GOOGL - FFLS | 53% Loosely correlated | -4.02% | ||
| NFLX - FFLS | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.97% | ||
More | ||||