Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLSE vs FFLS
CLSE vs FFLS Comparison
Open Charts CLSE vs FFLS
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
Price$23.61
Change+$0.05 (+0.21%)
Volume$126.28K
Net Assets185.44M
Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Price$25.68
Change+$0.04 (+0.16%)
Volume$5.64K
Net Assets41.62M
CLSE vs FFLS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLSE vs. FFLS commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSE is a Buy and FFLS is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSE has more net assets: 185M vs. FFLS (41.6M). FFLS has a higher annual dividend yield than CLSE: FFLS (11.533) vs CLSE (3.055). CLSE was incepted earlier than FFLS: CLSE (16 years) vs FFLS (2 years). FFLS (1.24) has a lower expense ratio than CLSE (1.44). CLSE has a higher turnover FFLS (88.00) vs FFLS (88.00).
| CLSE | FFLS | CLSE / FFLS | |
| Gain YTD | 3.055 | 11.533 | 26% |
| Net Assets | 185M | 41.6M | 445% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.24 | 116% |
| Turnover | 225.05 | 88.00 | 256% |
| Yield | 0.89 | 0.16 | 567% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CLSE | FFLS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 64% | 13 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CLSE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSE has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSE jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSE | 100% | +0.21% | ||
| MTZ - CLSE | 76% Closely correlated | +2.44% | ||
| PRIM - CLSE | 72% Closely correlated | +3.22% | ||
| JCI - CLSE | 71% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| COHR - CLSE | 70% Closely correlated | +1.44% | ||
| GVA - CLSE | 68% Closely correlated | +1.13% | ||
More | ||||
FFLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLS has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFLS jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLS | 100% | +0.18% | ||
| NVDA - FFLS | 69% Closely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| MU - FFLS | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| META - FFLS | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| CRM - FFLS | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| GTLS - FFLS | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.76% | ||
More | ||||