Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLSE vs LSEQ
CLSE vs LSEQ Comparison
Open Charts CLSE vs LSEQ
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
Price$26.49
Change+$0.11 (+0.42%)
Volume$200
Net Assets241.2M
Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF
Price$28.48
Change-$0.11 (-0.38%)
Volume$208
Net Assets20.03M
CLSE vs LSEQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLSE vs. LSEQ commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSE is a Hold and LSEQ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSE has more net assets: 241M vs. LSEQ (20M). CLSE has a higher annual dividend yield than LSEQ: CLSE (15.146) vs LSEQ (3.989). CLSE was incepted earlier than LSEQ: CLSE (16 years) vs LSEQ (2 years). CLSE (1.44) has a lower expense ratio than LSEQ (1.98). CLSE has a higher turnover LSEQ (194.00) vs LSEQ (194.00).
| CLSE | LSEQ | CLSE / LSEQ | |
| Gain YTD | 15.146 | 3.989 | 380% |
| Net Assets | 241M | 20M | 1,205% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.98 | 73% |
| Turnover | 225.05 | 194.00 | 116% |
| Yield | 0.79 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CLSE | LSEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 86% | 27 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 6 days ago 55% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CLSE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSE has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSE jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSE | 100% | -0.49% | ||
| MTZ - CLSE | 76% Closely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| VRT - CLSE | 72% Closely correlated | -1.07% | ||
| FIX - CLSE | 70% Closely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| NVDA - CLSE | 70% Closely correlated | -2.81% | ||
| STRL - CLSE | 69% Closely correlated | +0.32% | ||
More | ||||
LSEQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LSEQ and PKG have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LSEQ and PKG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LSEQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSEQ | 100% | -0.39% | ||
| PKG - LSEQ | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.02% | ||
| GMED - LSEQ | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.26% | ||
| OGE - LSEQ | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.01% | ||
| SHW - LSEQ | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.91% | ||
| R - LSEQ | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.96% | ||
More | ||||