Advertisement
CLSK vs DDOG
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CleanSpark (CLSK) vs. Datadog (DDOG) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CleanSpark (CLSK), a Bitcoin miner expanding into AI infrastructure, shows stronger year-to-date (YTD) gains of about 20% compared to Datadog's (DDOG) 3%.
- CLSK trades at a lower valuation with no PE ratio due to losses, while DDOG has a high PE of 453 reflecting growth expectations.
- Recent momentum favors DDOG with product launches in AI monitoring, contrasting CLSK's mixed results amid Bitcoin volatility.
- CLSK exhibits higher risk with a beta of 3.72 versus DDOG's 1.29, appealing to aggressive traders.
- Analyst price targets suggest greater upside potential for CLSK at around 58% versus DDOG's 26%.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines CleanSpark (CLSK) and Datadog (DDOG), two companies navigating the intersection of cryptocurrency, AI infrastructure, and cloud software. CLSK focuses on Bitcoin mining with AI diversification, while DDOG provides observability tools increasingly vital for AI workloads. Traders seeking high-volatility plays in crypto-AI hybrids may eye CLSK, whereas growth-oriented investors in stable SaaS might prefer DDOG. This analysis highlights relative performance, sector dynamics, and market positioning to inform stock comparison decisions in the current environment.
CLSK Overview and Recent Performance
CleanSpark (CLSK) operates as a sustainable Bitcoin mining company, leveraging renewable energy and expanding into high-performance computing (HPC) and AI data centers. In recent market activity, the stock has traded around $12, down from its 52-week high of $23.61 but up 20% YTD amid Bitcoin price fluctuations. Key influences include achieving 50 EH/s (exahashes per second, a measure of mining power) hashrate and mining 658 Bitcoin in March, alongside Texas land acquisitions for AI infrastructure. Sentiment has been mixed, with dips tied to Q1 losses (EPS of -$1.32) and broader crypto miner sales of Bitcoin holdings, though expansion news supports long-term positioning. High trading volume reflects volatility driven by crypto trends and AI pivot optimism.
DDOG Overview and Recent Performance
Datadog (DDOG) delivers a cloud-based observability and security platform for IT infrastructure, applications, and logs, with growing AI integrations. Recently, shares have hovered near $140, within a 52-week range of $98-$202, posting modest 3% YTD gains but recent surges on positive software sector sentiment. Performance drivers include the launch of a GPU monitoring tool to optimize AI infrastructure costs, alongside strong Q4 results (EPS $0.59 beating estimates). Analyst upgrades and resilient demand have bolstered momentum, though high PE (453, price-to-earnings ratio) signals premium growth pricing. Steady volume and lower beta indicate relative stability amid AI tailwinds in cloud monitoring.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 performers from over 350 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across diverse strategies like momentum, trend following, swing trading, and AI/ML signals on timeframes from 5 minutes to days. These curated bots exhibit win rates of 51% to 88%, profit factors up to 11.7, and annualized returns reaching 163%, with profit-to-drawdown ratios as high as 17. Many target AI-themed sectors such as semiconductors and data centers, using techniques like take-profit/stop-loss corridors (e.g., 3%/2%). While none currently feature CLSK or DDOG prominently, their adaptive styles suit volatile markets. Investors can explore these high-performing bots for real-time signals and copy trading opportunities tailored to current conditions.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CleanSpark (CLSK) and Datadog (DDOG) diverge sharply in business models: CLSK’s crypto mining exposes it to Bitcoin volatility and energy costs, offset by AI/HPC diversification, while DDOG’s SaaS model drives recurring revenue from enterprise monitoring. Growth drivers contrast CLSK’s hashrate expansion against DDOG’s AI product innovations. Recent momentum shows CLSK’s superior YTD returns but steeper dips, versus DDOG’s steadier climbs. Risk factors amplify for CLSK via high beta and losses, while DDOG faces valuation pressures. Sector-wise, both tap AI, but CLSK leans crypto infrastructure and DDOG cloud analytics. Market sentiment favors DDOG’s stability over CLSK’s trade-offs.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI models would likely favor Datadog (DDOG) in the current environment due to its trend consistency, lower volatility, and AI-specific catalysts like GPU monitoring, offering probabilistic outperformance amid SaaS resilience. CleanSpark (CLSK) presents higher-reward potential from YTD momentum and infrastructure growth but trails in stability metrics.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a Hold and DDOG is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileDDOG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- DDOG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLSK’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DDOG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLSK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- DDOG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -14.76% price change this week, while DDOG (@Packaged Software) price change was -5.35% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -5.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.37%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -4.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.62%.
Reported Earning Dates
CLSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.
DDOG is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-5.89% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Packaged Software (-4.49% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CLSK | DDOG | CLSK / DDOG | |
| Capitalization | 4B | 83.3B | 5% |
| EBITDA | -69.3M | 229M | -30% |
| Gain YTD | 54.051 | 72.152 | 75% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.38 | 600.28 | 1% |
| Revenue | 740M | 3.67B | 20% |
| Total Cash | 935M | 4.76B | 20% |
| Total Debt | 1.79B | 1.29B | 139% |
CLSK | DDOG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 45 | 93 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | 95 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 41 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 88 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 8 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CLSK's Valuation (71) in the null industry is in the same range as DDOG (95). This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to DDOG’s over the last 12 months.
DDOG's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLSK (100). This means that DDOG’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
DDOG's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as CLSK (98). This means that DDOG’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
DDOG's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as CLSK (38). This means that DDOG’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
DDOG's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLSK (86). This means that DDOG’s stock grew significantly faster than CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
| CLSK | DDOG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 57% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 87% | 7 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 75% |
Advertisement
DDOG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DDOG has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DDOG jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DDOG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DDOG | 100% | -3.90% | ||
| COIN - DDOG | 63% Loosely correlated | -7.15% | ||
| CLSK - DDOG | 60% Loosely correlated | -7.09% | ||
| CRWD - DDOG | 58% Loosely correlated | -6.68% | ||
| NET - DDOG | 58% Loosely correlated | -6.90% | ||
| ZS - DDOG | 58% Loosely correlated | -3.31% | ||
More | ||||