CLSK
Price
$7.32
Change
-$0.09 (-1.21%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.78B
33 days until earnings call
DMGGF
Price
$0.16
Change
-$0.01 (-5.88%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
55.03M
54 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CLSK vs DMGGF

Header iconCLSK vs DMGGF Comparison
Open Charts CLSK vs DMGGFBanner chart's image
CleanSpark
Price$7.32
Change-$0.09 (-1.21%)
Volume$137.67K
Capitalization4.78B
DMG Blockchain Solutions
Price$0.16
Change-$0.01 (-5.88%)
Volume$116.92K
Capitalization55.03M
CLSK vs DMGGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
DMGGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLSK vs. DMGGF commentary
Apr 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a Hold and DMGGF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CLSK: $7.41 vs. DMGGF: $0.16)
Brand notoriety: CLSK and DMGGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLSK: 74% vs. DMGGF: 68%
Market capitalization -- CLSK: $4.78B vs. DMGGF: $55.03M
CLSK [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $4.78B. DMGGF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $55.03M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileDMGGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • DMGGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CLSK and DMGGF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DMGGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • DMGGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -5.54% price change this week, while DMGGF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -20.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -5.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +137.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLSK is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

DMGGF is expected to report earnings on May 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-5.44% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSK($4.78B) has a higher market cap than DMGGF($55M). CLSK YTD gains are higher at: -19.544 vs. DMGGF (-36.189). CLSK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 60.4M vs. DMGGF (-7.99M). CLSK has more cash in the bank: 176M vs. DMGGF (5.06M). DMGGF has less debt than CLSK: DMGGF (1.39M) vs CLSK (15.2M). CLSK has higher revenues than DMGGF: CLSK (216M) vs DMGGF (31.9M).
CLSKDMGGFCLSK / DMGGF
Capitalization4.78B55M8,693%
EBITDA60.4M-7.99M-756%
Gain YTD-19.544-36.18954%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue216M31.9M677%
Total Cash176M5.06M3,480%
Total Debt15.2M1.39M1,094%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLSK vs DMGGF: Fundamental Ratings
CLSK
DMGGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6170
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8294
SMR RATING
1..100
8494
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6391
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
75100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DMGGF's Valuation (53) in the null industry is in the same range as CLSK (74). This means that DMGGF’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as DMGGF (94). This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to DMGGF’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's SMR Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as DMGGF (94). This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to DMGGF’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's Price Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as DMGGF (91). This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to DMGGF’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's P/E Growth Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as DMGGF (100). This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to DMGGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DMGGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DMGGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TPVG6.75-0.19
-2.74%
TRIPLEPOINT VENTURE GROWTH BDC Corp
KRON0.80-0.04
-4.31%
Kronos Bio
SNPS417.76-20.79
-4.74%
Synopsys
XPEL27.83-2.48
-8.18%
XPEL
NOVT115.73-12.92
-10.04%
Novanta

DMGGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DMGGF has been closely correlated with HUT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DMGGF jumps, then HUT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DMGGF
1D Price
Change %
DMGGF100%
-5.64%
HUT - DMGGF
68%
Closely correlated
-11.05%
HIVE - DMGGF
67%
Closely correlated
-8.07%
BTBT - DMGGF
60%
Loosely correlated
-10.05%
RIOT - DMGGF
60%
Loosely correlated
-8.98%
CLSK - DMGGF
59%
Loosely correlated
-7.61%
More