CLSK
Price
$9.55
Change
-$0.03 (-0.31%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
2.68B
110 days until earnings call
DMGGF
Price
$0.19
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
38.2M
111 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLSK vs DMGGF

Header iconCLSK vs DMGGF Comparison
Open Charts CLSK vs DMGGFBanner chart's image
CleanSpark
Price$9.55
Change-$0.03 (-0.31%)
Volume$16.49M
Capitalization2.68B
DMG Blockchain Solutions
Price$0.19
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$141.99K
Capitalization38.2M
CLSK vs DMGGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DMGGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLSK vs. DMGGF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a Hold and DMGGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CLSK: $9.55 vs. DMGGF: $0.19)
Brand notoriety: CLSK and DMGGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLSK: 72% vs. DMGGF: 77%
Market capitalization -- CLSK: $2.68B vs. DMGGF: $38.2M
CLSK [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $2.68B. DMGGF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $38.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileDMGGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • DMGGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DMGGF is a better buy in the long-term than CLSK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLSK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DMGGF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLSK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • DMGGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLSK is a better buy in the short-term than DMGGF.

Price Growth

CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +2.36% price change this week, while DMGGF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +5.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.07%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLSK is expected to report earnings on Dec 17, 2025.

DMGGF is expected to report earnings on Dec 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.07% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSK($2.68B) has a higher market cap than DMGGF($38.2M). CLSK YTD gains are higher at: 3.692 vs. DMGGF (-21.311). CLSK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 626M vs. DMGGF (2.15M). CLSK has more cash in the bank: 916M vs. DMGGF (1.04M). DMGGF has less debt than CLSK: DMGGF (20.7M) vs CLSK (820M). CLSK has higher revenues than DMGGF: CLSK (632M) vs DMGGF (38.5M).
CLSKDMGGFCLSK / DMGGF
Capitalization2.68B38.2M7,026%
EBITDA626M2.15M29,089%
Gain YTD3.692-21.311-17%
P/E Ratio11.10N/A-
Revenue632M38.5M1,642%
Total Cash916M1.04M88,332%
Total Debt820M20.7M3,961%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLSK vs DMGGF: Fundamental Ratings
CLSK
DMGGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5458
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9197
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6264
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DMGGF's Valuation (64) in the null industry is in the same range as CLSK (72). This means that DMGGF’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's Profit vs Risk Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as DMGGF (97). This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to DMGGF’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as DMGGF (100). This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to DMGGF’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's Price Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as DMGGF (64). This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to DMGGF’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as DMGGF (100). This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to DMGGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSKDMGGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DMGGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MRSAX25.95N/A
N/A
MFS Research International A
NSVAX14.63N/A
N/A
Columbia Small Cap Value II Inst
SMVIX23.65N/A
N/A
SEI Small Cap Value I (SIMT)
JOMEX15.61N/A
N/A
JOHCM Emerging Mkts Discovery Advisor
CSCRX32.91N/A
N/A
Columbia Small Cap Growth Inst2

CLSK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSK has been closely correlated with MSTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSK jumps, then MSTR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLSK
1D Price
Change %
CLSK100%
-0.31%
MSTR - CLSK
74%
Closely correlated
-0.94%
COIN - CLSK
74%
Closely correlated
-0.16%
AFRM - CLSK
71%
Closely correlated
+3.09%
TTD - CLSK
68%
Closely correlated
+5.15%
LSPD - CLSK
67%
Closely correlated
+1.72%
More

DMGGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DMGGF has been closely correlated with HUT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DMGGF jumps, then HUT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DMGGF
1D Price
Change %
DMGGF100%
-1.54%
HUT - DMGGF
68%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
HIVE - DMGGF
67%
Closely correlated
N/A
BTBT - DMGGF
60%
Loosely correlated
-4.74%
RIOT - DMGGF
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.85%
CLSK - DMGGF
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
More