Ad is loading...
CLSK
Price
$14.03
Change
+$0.05 (+0.36%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
31 days until earnings call
DT
Price
$52.35
Change
-$1.52 (-2.82%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
73 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CLSK vs DT

Header iconCLSK vs DT Comparison
Open Charts CLSK vs DTBanner chart's image
CleanSpark
Price$14.03
Change+$0.05 (+0.36%)
Volume$31.08M
CapitalizationN/A
Dynatrace
Price$52.35
Change-$1.52 (-2.82%)
Volume$3.19M
CapitalizationN/A
CLSK vs DT Comparison Chart
Loading...
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
DT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLSK vs. DT commentary
Nov 17, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a Hold and DT is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 17, 2024
Stock price -- (CLSK: $14.03 vs. DT: $52.35)
Brand notoriety: CLSK and DT are both not notable
CLSK represents the Investment Banks/Brokers, while DT is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLSK: 107% vs. DT: 110%
Market capitalization -- CLSK: $4.78B vs. DT: $13.75B
CLSK [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $4.78B. DT’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $13.75B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.53B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileDT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • DT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DT is a better buy in the long-term than CLSK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLSK’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLSK’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • DT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLSK is a better buy in the short-term than DT.

Price Growth

CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +3.39% price change this week, while DT (@Packaged Software) price change was -1.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +2.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.06%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLSK is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

DT is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+2.23% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

@Packaged Software (-1.01% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DT($13.7B) has a higher market cap than CLSK($4.78B). CLSK YTD gains are higher at: 27.199 vs. DT (-4.279). DT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 180M vs. CLSK (60.4M). DT has more cash in the bank: 783M vs. CLSK (176M). CLSK has less debt than DT: CLSK (15.2M) vs DT (74.3M). DT has higher revenues than CLSK: DT (1.36B) vs CLSK (216M).
CLSKDTCLSK / DT
Capitalization4.78B13.7B35%
EBITDA60.4M180M34%
Gain YTD27.199-4.279-636%
P/E RatioN/A69.30-
Revenue216M1.36B16%
Total Cash176M783M22%
Total Debt15.2M74.3M20%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLSK: Fundamental Ratings
CLSK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
26
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
73
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
87
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSKDT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
DT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CMCI24.68N/A
N/A
VanEck® CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF
HTRB33.64-0.03
-0.09%
Hartford Total Return Bond ETF
FFLS23.47-0.38
-1.59%
Future Fund Long/Short ETF
MBCC34.89-0.63
-1.77%
Monarch Blue Chips Core ETF
FNGS52.47-1.48
-2.74%
MicroSectors™ FANG+™ ETN

CLSK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSK has been closely correlated with RIOT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSK jumps, then RIOT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLSK
1D Price
Change %
CLSK100%
+0.36%
RIOT - CLSK
86%
Closely correlated
+4.26%
MARA - CLSK
83%
Closely correlated
+1.35%
HIVE - CLSK
77%
Closely correlated
+2.90%
WULF - CLSK
74%
Closely correlated
+3.38%
MSTR - CLSK
74%
Closely correlated
+3.96%
More