CLSK
Price
$14.51
Change
-$0.36 (-2.42%)
Updated
Sep 30, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.08B
77 days until earnings call
MQ
Price
$5.28
Change
-$0.12 (-2.22%)
Updated
Sep 30, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.4B
35 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLSK vs MQ

Header iconCLSK vs MQ Comparison
Open Charts CLSK vs MQBanner chart's image
CleanSpark
Price$14.51
Change-$0.36 (-2.42%)
Volume$135.12K
Capitalization4.08B
Marqeta
Price$5.28
Change-$0.12 (-2.22%)
Volume$114.86K
Capitalization2.4B
CLSK vs MQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLSK vs. MQ commentary
Oct 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a StrongBuy and MQ is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 01, 2025
Stock price -- (CLSK: $14.87 vs. MQ: $5.40)
Brand notoriety: CLSK and MQ are both not notable
CLSK represents the Investment Banks/Brokers, while MQ is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLSK: 170% vs. MQ: 64%
Market capitalization -- CLSK: $4.08B vs. MQ: $2.4B
CLSK [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $4.08B. MQ’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $2.4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.8T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.67B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $27.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLSK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMQ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLSK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLSK is a better buy in the long-term than MQ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLSK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MQ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLSK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MQ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLSK is a better buy in the short-term than MQ.

Price Growth

CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +8.22% price change this week, while MQ (@Computer Communications) price change was -5.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -1.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +78.05%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -1.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +68.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLSK is expected to report earnings on Dec 17, 2025.

MQ is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-1.04% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

@Computer Communications (-1.75% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSK($4.08B) has a higher market cap than MQ($2.4B). MQ has higher P/E ratio than CLSK: MQ (56.80) vs CLSK (16.87). CLSK YTD gains are higher at: 61.455 vs. MQ (42.480). CLSK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 626M vs. MQ (-85.47M). CLSK has more cash in the bank: 916M vs. MQ (822M). MQ has less debt than CLSK: MQ (14.5M) vs CLSK (820M). CLSK has higher revenues than MQ: CLSK (632M) vs MQ (553M).
CLSKMQCLSK / MQ
Capitalization4.08B2.4B170%
EBITDA626M-85.47M-732%
Gain YTD61.45542.480145%
P/E Ratio16.8756.8030%
Revenue632M553M114%
Total Cash916M822M111%
Total Debt820M14.5M5,655%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLSK: Fundamental Ratings
CLSK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
25
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
89
SMR RATING
1..100
51
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
16
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSKMQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TOLIX16.68N/A
N/A
DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure Inst
JERNX12.32N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Global Real Estate N
MCVIX33.22N/A
N/A
MFS Mid Cap Value I
YAFIX20.86N/A
N/A
AMG Yacktman Focused I
LCFLX14.98N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value C

MQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MQ has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MQ jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MQ
1D Price
Change %
MQ100%
+0.75%
COIN - MQ
64%
Loosely correlated
+6.85%
CLSK - MQ
59%
Loosely correlated
+14.74%
COMP - MQ
51%
Loosely correlated
+3.40%
RIOT - MQ
50%
Loosely correlated
+11.81%
ALRM - MQ
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
More