Advertisement
CLSK vs PAGS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a Buy and PAGS is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAGS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PAGS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLSK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAGS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLSK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PAGS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -0.38% price change this week, while PAGS (@Computer Communications) price change was -2.45% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -1.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.90%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -2.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.26%.
Reported Earning Dates
CLSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.
PAGS is expected to report earnings on Aug 20, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-1.94% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Computer Communications (-2.46% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
| CLSK | PAGS | CLSK / PAGS | |
| Capitalization | 4.41B | 2.45B | 180% |
| EBITDA | -69.3M | 8.97B | -1% |
| Gain YTD | 69.911 | -5.457 | -1,281% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.38 | 6.21 | 119% |
| Revenue | 740M | 20.6B | 4% |
| Total Cash | 935M | 4.42B | 21% |
| Total Debt | 1.79B | 44B | 4% |
CLSK | PAGS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 38 | 14 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 72 Overvalued | 76 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 91 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 59 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 67 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CLSK's Valuation (72) in the null industry is in the same range as PAGS (76) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to PAGS’s over the last 12 months.
CLSK's Profit vs Risk Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as PAGS (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to PAGS’s over the last 12 months.
PAGS's SMR Rating (59) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLSK (98) in the null industry. This means that PAGS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
CLSK's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as PAGS (59) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to PAGS’s over the last 12 months.
PAGS's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as CLSK (86) in the null industry. This means that PAGS’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
| CLSK | PAGS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 12 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 69% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ICF | 67.73 | 0.85 | +1.27% |
| iShares Select U.S. REIT ETF | |||
| FFGX | 35.55 | 0.19 | +0.55% |
| Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF | |||
| FMY | 11.68 | -0.01 | -0.09% |
| FIRST TRUST MORTGAGE Income FUND | |||
| FBDC | 16.50 | -0.19 | -1.16% |
| FT Confluence BDC & SpecialtyFinacIncETF | |||
| COPP | 41.52 | -0.54 | -1.28% |
| Sprott Copper Miners ETF | |||
PAGS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAGS has been closely correlated with STNE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAGS jumps, then STNE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAGS | 100% | -0.11% | ||
| STNE - PAGS | 72% Closely correlated | +1.51% | ||
| COIN - PAGS | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.97% | ||
| CLSK - PAGS | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.31% | ||
| COMP - PAGS | 41% Loosely correlated | -2.30% | ||
| FLYW - PAGS | 40% Loosely correlated | -2.71% | ||
More | ||||