CLSK
Price
$16.48
Change
+$0.31 (+1.92%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
4.23B
58 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
S
Price
$14.85
Change
+$0.09 (+0.61%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
5.09B
74 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLSK vs S

Header iconCLSK vs S Comparison
Open Charts CLSK vs SBanner chart's image
CLSK vs S Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) vs. SentinelOne, Inc. (S) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) operates as a bitcoin mining and digital infrastructure company with recent focus on AI-ready data centers, showing stronger year-to-date returns compared to SentinelOne, Inc. (S).
  • SentinelOne, Inc. (S) provides AI-powered cybersecurity solutions, with more modest recent performance amid broader technology sector movements.
  • CLSK experienced earnings and revenue misses in its second fiscal quarter 2026 results, yet market participants continue to monitor its expansion in power capacity for compute-intensive workloads.
  • S reported stable positioning ahead of its first-quarter earnings, with emphasis on recurring revenue growth in the cybersecurity space.
  • Both stocks operate in high-growth technology-adjacent sectors but differ significantly in business models, risk profiles, and sensitivity to cryptocurrency prices versus enterprise software demand.
  • Relative performance in recent weeks reflects distinct catalysts, with CLSK tied to energy and digital asset trends while S tracks cybersecurity spending patterns.

Introduction

This comparison examines CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) and SentinelOne, Inc. (S) to highlight differences in business models, recent market behavior, and positioning within their respective sectors. Traders and investors focused on technology infrastructure, digital assets, and cybersecurity may find the analysis relevant for assessing relative momentum and risk factors. The review draws on observable price action, earnings outcomes, and sector dynamics over recent market activity without projecting future results.

CLSK Overview and Recent Performance

CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) develops and operates large-scale data centers, with roots in bitcoin mining and expanding applications for artificial intelligence workloads. In recent weeks, the stock has reflected volatility linked to cryptocurrency prices and operational updates on hashrate capacity. The company reported second fiscal quarter 2026 results that included revenue and earnings per share misses relative to analyst expectations, prompting a measured market reaction. Sentiment has been influenced by ongoing commercialization of AI-ready power capacity and production metrics, with year-to-date returns notably outpacing broader market benchmarks amid fluctuating digital asset conditions.

S Overview and Recent Performance

SentinelOne, Inc. (S) delivers an artificial intelligence-driven cybersecurity platform focused on endpoint protection and extended detection and response. Recent market activity for the stock has aligned with technology sector rotations and expectations surrounding upcoming quarterly results. The company has emphasized recurring revenue stability and product adoption within enterprise environments. Performance over recent weeks has shown more contained movements compared to higher-beta peers, with year-to-date gains trailing those of certain infrastructure names but reflecting steady positioning in the software-infrastructure category.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron maintains a curated section of its AI trading bots known as Trending AI Robots. The platform offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots that trade thousands of different tickers, yet only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions appear in this section. Available bots span a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance statistics, and ticker universes, with many showing win rates between 60% and 80% alongside varying profit factors and drawdown profiles depending on the specific model. Readers interested in automated approaches can explore the full selection for additional context on current market dynamics.

Head-to-Head Comparison

CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) and SentinelOne, Inc. (S) represent contrasting approaches within technology-driven markets. CLSK centers on physical infrastructure and energy-intensive compute, exposing it to cryptocurrency price swings and power-market dynamics, whereas S focuses on software subscriptions with recurring revenue characteristics typical of cybersecurity providers. Recent momentum for CLSK has been more pronounced on a year-to-date basis, accompanied by higher volatility, while S has exhibited relatively steadier behavior tied to enterprise spending cycles. Risk factors differ accordingly: CLSK faces commodity and operational execution variables, and S contends with competitive pressures and customer acquisition costs. Sector exposure places CLSK at the intersection of digital assets and data-center development, while S remains anchored in information-security demand.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, earnings positioning, and relative sector momentum in recent market activity, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a probabilistic edge to CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) over SentinelOne, Inc. (S). This assessment reflects CLSK’s stronger recent performance metrics and infrastructure expansion signals, though outcomes remain subject to ongoing volatility in digital asset markets and broader economic conditions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CLSK vs. S commentary
Jun 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a Hold and S is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 14, 2026
Stock price -- (CLSK: $16.48 vs. S: $14.85)
Brand notoriety: CLSK: Not notable vs. S: Notable
CLSK represents the Investment Banks/Brokers, while S is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLSK: 86% vs. S: 64%
Market capitalization -- CLSK: $4.23B vs. S: $5.09B
CLSK [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $4.23B. S’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $5.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $2.9T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $13.95B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $29.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • S’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, S is a better buy in the long-term than CLSK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLSK’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while S’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLSK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • S’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CLSK and S are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +5.71% price change this week, while S (@Computer Communications) price change was -6.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.85%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -1.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

S is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.59% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

@Computer Communications (-1.12% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
S($5.09B) has a higher market cap than CLSK($4.23B). CLSK YTD gains are higher at: 62.846 vs. S (-1.000). CLSK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -69.3M vs. S (-245.49M). CLSK has more cash in the bank: 935M vs. S (657M). S has less debt than CLSK: S (15M) vs CLSK (1.79B). S has higher revenues than CLSK: S (1.05B) vs CLSK (740M).
CLSKSCLSK / S
Capitalization4.23B5.09B83%
EBITDA-69.3M-245.49M28%
Gain YTD62.846-1.000-6,285%
P/E Ratio7.38N/A-
Revenue740M1.05B71%
Total Cash935M657M142%
Total Debt1.79B15M11,940%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLSK vs S: Fundamental Ratings
CLSK
S
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9172
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9293
SMR RATING
1..100
9997
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3761
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
871
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5042

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

S's Valuation (52) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as CLSK (72) in the null industry. This means that S’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as S (93) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to S’s over the last 12 months.

S's SMR Rating (97) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as CLSK (99) in the null industry. This means that S’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as S (61) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to S’s over the last 12 months.

S's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLSK (87) in the null industry. This means that S’s stock grew significantly faster than CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSKS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLSK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
S
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SIXH42.970.40
+0.94%
ETC 6 Meridian Hdg Eq-Idx Opt Strat ETF
PLDR37.84N/A
N/A
Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF
BOND91.87-0.04
-0.04%
PIMCO Active Bond ETF
BDBT25.19-0.03
-0.12%
Bluemonte Core Bond ETF
SPPP13.40-0.16
-1.18%
Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust

CLSK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSK has been closely correlated with MARA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSK jumps, then MARA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLSK
1D Price
Change %
CLSK100%
+1.92%
MARA - CLSK
82%
Closely correlated
+3.45%
RIOT - CLSK
78%
Closely correlated
+1.80%
KEEL - CLSK
76%
Closely correlated
+1.27%
MSTR - CLSK
74%
Closely correlated
+3.18%
COIN - CLSK
74%
Closely correlated
-0.41%
More

S and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, S has been loosely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if S jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To S
1D Price
Change %
S100%
+0.61%
HUBS - S
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.83%
COIN - S
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
CLSK - S
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.92%
CRM - S
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
CDNS - S
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
More