CLSK
Price
$9.54
Change
-$0.05 (-0.52%)
Updated
Aug 28, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.68B
111 days until earnings call
TOST
Price
$44.96
Change
+$1.10 (+2.51%)
Updated
Aug 28, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
26.21B
75 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLSK vs TOST

Header iconCLSK vs TOST Comparison
Open Charts CLSK vs TOSTBanner chart's image
CleanSpark
Price$9.54
Change-$0.05 (-0.52%)
Volume$242.69K
Capitalization2.68B
Toast
Price$44.96
Change+$1.10 (+2.51%)
Volume$56.35K
Capitalization26.21B
CLSK vs TOST Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TOST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLSK vs. TOST commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a Buy and TOST is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CLSK: $9.58 vs. TOST: $43.86)
Brand notoriety: CLSK and TOST are both not notable
CLSK represents the Investment Banks/Brokers, while TOST is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLSK: 68% vs. TOST: 87%
Market capitalization -- CLSK: $2.68B vs. TOST: $26.21B
CLSK [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $2.68B. TOST’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $26.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.79T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.24B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $26.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTOST’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TOST’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TOST is a better buy in the long-term than CLSK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLSK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TOST’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLSK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TOST’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLSK is a better buy in the short-term than TOST.

Price Growth

CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +0.95% price change this week, while TOST (@Computer Communications) price change was +3.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +3.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.77%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +3.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +42.40%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLSK is expected to report earnings on Dec 17, 2025.

TOST is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+3.37% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

@Computer Communications (+3.50% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TOST($26.2B) has a higher market cap than CLSK($2.68B). TOST has higher P/E ratio than CLSK: TOST (115.26) vs CLSK (11.10). TOST YTD gains are higher at: 20.329 vs. CLSK (4.017). CLSK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 626M vs. TOST (254M). TOST has more cash in the bank: 1.7B vs. CLSK (916M). TOST has less debt than CLSK: TOST (19M) vs CLSK (820M). TOST has higher revenues than CLSK: TOST (5.53B) vs CLSK (632M).
CLSKTOSTCLSK / TOST
Capitalization2.68B26.2B10%
EBITDA626M254M246%
Gain YTD4.01720.32920%
P/E Ratio11.10115.2610%
Revenue632M5.53B11%
Total Cash916M1.7B54%
Total Debt820M19M4,316%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLSK: Fundamental Ratings
CLSK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
55
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
93
SMR RATING
1..100
51
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSKTOST
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TOST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BALI31.050.05
+0.16%
iShares Advantage Large Cap Income ETF
ITDI35.920.05
+0.13%
iShares LifePath Target Date 2065 ETF
HWSM25.29N/A
N/A
Hotchkis & Wiley SMID Cap Divers Val Fd
JPLD52.40-0.02
-0.04%
JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF
BUZZ32.23-0.21
-0.64%
VanEck Social Sentiment ETF

TOST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TOST has been loosely correlated with PAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TOST jumps, then PAR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TOST
1D Price
Change %
TOST100%
-0.05%
PAR - TOST
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.35%
COIN - TOST
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
CLSK - TOST
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.03%
CPAY - TOST
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.02%
FOUR - TOST
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.94%
More