Advertisement
CLSK vs VEEV
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CleanSpark (CLSK) vs. Veeva Systems (VEEV) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CLSK (CleanSpark) operates in Bitcoin mining and has shown strong year-to-date gains exceeding 80%, driven by capacity expansions despite a recent earnings miss.
- VEEV (Veeva Systems) provides cloud-based software for life sciences and maintains more stable performance ahead of its fiscal first-quarter results scheduled for June 3, 2026.
- CLSK exhibits higher volatility tied to cryptocurrency prices and operational metrics such as hashrate growth, while VEEV benefits from recurring subscription revenue and sector-specific demand.
- Recent market activity shows CLSK trading near $18 with significant beta exposure to crypto sentiment, contrasting VEEV’s positioning around $174 with lower relative volatility.
- Business models differ sharply: CLSK focuses on energy-efficient mining infrastructure, whereas VEEV delivers industry-specific software solutions with high gross margins.
- Sentiment for CLSK reflects mixed reactions to earnings and expansion news, while VEEV carries anticipation around upcoming results and broader software sector trends.
Introduction
Investors and traders seeking to evaluate contrasting opportunities in the technology and digital asset sectors often examine pairs like CLSK and VEEV. CleanSpark represents exposure to Bitcoin mining and energy infrastructure, while Veeva Systems offers enterprise software tailored to life sciences compliance and operations. This comparison highlights differences in business models, recent relative performance, and market positioning. It is particularly relevant for those assessing volatility versus stability, growth catalysts in cryptocurrency versus software-as-a-service, and sector-specific risks within the current environment.
CleanSpark (CLSK) Overview and Recent Performance
CleanSpark, Inc. develops and operates Bitcoin mining facilities with an emphasis on sustainable energy sources. In recent weeks, the stock has traded near $18 following volatility tied to its second fiscal quarter 2026 results. Revenue reached $136.4 million, missing some expectations, and earnings per share (EPS) came in at -$1.52 against forecasts. The company reported increases in Bitcoin holdings and average monthly hashrate year-over-year, alongside expansions in contracted power capacity. Performance has been influenced by cryptocurrency price movements and operational updates, contributing to elevated beta relative to broader markets.
Veeva Systems (VEEV) Overview and Recent Performance
Veeva Systems, Inc. delivers cloud-based software platforms for customer relationship management, quality, and regulatory compliance primarily serving the life sciences industry. In recent market activity, shares have hovered around $174 ahead of the company’s fiscal first-quarter 2027 earnings release scheduled for June 3, 2026. Prior quarterly results demonstrated revenue growth and margin expansion, supporting positive sentiment. The stock has benefited from steady demand for its subscription-based offerings and limited direct exposure to commodity price swings, resulting in comparatively steadier price behavior during the period.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available across the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, risk parameters, and performance statistics tailored to prevailing market conditions. Only those demonstrating strong suitability and consistent metrics earn placement in the trending section. Available bots span diverse approaches with reported win rates, profit factors, and drawdown ranges that appeal to different investor profiles. The page provides an informational resource for exploring automated trading options suited to current environments.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CleanSpark and Veeva Systems operate in distinct sectors with contrasting risk-return profiles. CLSK derives growth primarily from Bitcoin production scale and energy cost efficiencies, exposing it to digital asset price fluctuations and regulatory developments in mining. VEEV generates predictable recurring revenue through long-term software contracts, offering greater visibility but sensitivity to healthcare IT spending and competition. Recent momentum favors CLSK on expansion metrics yet reflects earnings pressure, while VEEV shows resilience ahead of results. Risk factors for CLSK include high volatility and commodity correlation; for VEEV, they center on valuation multiples and macroeconomic effects on software budgets. Sector exposure places CLSK in digital assets and infrastructure versus VEEV in vertical software.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, earnings visibility, and relative stability, Tickeron’s AI models currently indicate a probabilistic preference for VEEV over CLSK. Veeva’s recurring revenue model and upcoming results provide clearer near-term catalysts with lower volatility compared to CleanSpark’s sensitivity to cryptocurrency dynamics and recent earnings variability. This assessment reflects positioning rather than certainty and should be evaluated alongside individual risk tolerance.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a Hold and VEEV is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVEEV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- VEEV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLSK’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VEEV’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLSK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- VEEV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -14.76% price change this week, while VEEV (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was -0.99% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -5.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.37%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was -3.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.85%.
Reported Earning Dates
CLSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.
VEEV is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-5.89% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Services to the Health Industry (-3.56% weekly)This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.
| CLSK | VEEV | CLSK / VEEV | |
| Capitalization | 4B | 28.2B | 14% |
| EBITDA | -69.3M | 954M | -7% |
| Gain YTD | 54.051 | -22.676 | -238% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.38 | 30.60 | 24% |
| Revenue | 740M | 3.2B | 23% |
| Total Cash | 935M | 6.56B | 14% |
| Total Debt | 1.79B | 95.9M | 1,868% |
CLSK | VEEV | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 45 | 4 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | 72 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 61 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 94 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CLSK's Valuation (71) in the null industry is in the same range as VEEV (72) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to VEEV’s over the last 12 months.
CLSK's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as VEEV (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to VEEV’s over the last 12 months.
VEEV's SMR Rating (61) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLSK (98) in the null industry. This means that VEEV’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLSK’s over the last 12 months.
CLSK's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as VEEV (63) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to VEEV’s over the last 12 months.
CLSK's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as VEEV (94) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to VEEV’s over the last 12 months.
| CLSK | VEEV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 87% | 6 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JETU | 30.12 | 0.26 | +0.88% |
| MAX Airlines 3X Leveraged ETN | |||
| VETZ | 19.58 | -0.07 | -0.36% |
| Academy Veteran Bond ETF | |||
| JNK | 95.73 | -0.42 | -0.44% |
| State Street® SPDR® Blmbg Hi Yld Bd ETF | |||
| QMAR | 36.74 | -0.56 | -1.50% |
| FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – Mar | |||
| GXDW | 27.06 | -2.52 | -8.52% |
| Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF | |||
VEEV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VEEV has been loosely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VEEV jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VEEV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VEEV | 100% | -3.35% | ||
| CLSK - VEEV | 55% Loosely correlated | -7.09% | ||
| COIN - VEEV | 54% Loosely correlated | -7.15% | ||
| RIOT - VEEV | 50% Loosely correlated | -10.23% | ||
| WEAV - VEEV | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.39% | ||
| WAY - VEEV | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.09% | ||
More | ||||