CLSK
Price
$10.97
Change
+$0.71 (+6.92%)
Updated
Jan 30 closing price
Capitalization
4.78B
6 days until earnings call
VRAR
Price
$1.72
Change
+$0.03 (+1.78%)
Updated
Jan 30, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
18.82M
18 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CLSK vs VRAR

Header iconCLSK vs VRAR Comparison
Open Charts CLSK vs VRARBanner chart's image
CleanSpark
Price$10.97
Change+$0.71 (+6.92%)
Volume$24.16M
Capitalization4.78B
Glimpse Group (The)
Price$1.72
Change+$0.03 (+1.78%)
Volume$300
Capitalization18.82M
CLSK vs VRAR Comparison Chart
Loading...
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VRAR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLSK vs. VRAR commentary
Jan 31, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a StrongBuy and VRAR is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 31, 2025
Stock price -- (CLSK: $10.97 vs. VRAR: $1.71)
Brand notoriety: CLSK and VRAR are both not notable
CLSK represents the Investment Banks/Brokers, while VRAR is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLSK: 77% vs. VRAR: 4%
Market capitalization -- CLSK: $4.78B vs. VRAR: $18.82M
CLSK [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $4.78B. VRAR’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $18.82M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.67B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVRAR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VRAR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, VRAR is a better buy in the long-term than CLSK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLSK’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VRAR’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLSK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • VRAR’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLSK is a better buy in the short-term than VRAR.

Price Growth

CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -3.86% price change this week, while VRAR (@Packaged Software) price change was -9.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +2.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +61.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +45.56%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLSK is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

VRAR is expected to report earnings on May 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+2.71% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

@Packaged Software (+0.73% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLSK($4.78B) has a higher market cap than VRAR($18.8M). CLSK YTD gains are higher at: 19.110 vs. VRAR (-30.769). CLSK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 60.4M vs. VRAR (-9.57M). CLSK has more cash in the bank: 176M vs. VRAR (5.22M). VRAR has less debt than CLSK: VRAR (736K) vs CLSK (15.2M). CLSK has higher revenues than VRAR: CLSK (216M) vs VRAR (11.8M).
CLSKVRARCLSK / VRAR
Capitalization4.78B18.8M25,431%
EBITDA60.4M-9.57M-631%
Gain YTD19.110-30.769-62%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue216M11.8M1,831%
Total Cash176M5.22M3,371%
Total Debt15.2M736K2,065%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLSK: Fundamental Ratings
CLSK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
22
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
80
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
86
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSKVRAR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
83%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
87%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VRAR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SOGP2.220.07
+3.40%
Sound Group
PPL33.470.74
+2.26%
PPL Corp
CXT64.230.77
+1.21%
Crane NXT Co
ONIT35.93-0.06
-0.17%
Onity Group Inc.
OCFC18.03-0.23
-1.26%
OceanFirst Financial Corp

VRAR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VRAR has been loosely correlated with NUKK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VRAR jumps, then NUKK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VRAR
1D Price
Change %
VRAR100%
+1.18%
NUKK - VRAR
42%
Loosely correlated
+3.01%
COIN - VRAR
40%
Loosely correlated
+3.54%
RIOT - VRAR
38%
Loosely correlated
+6.06%
CLSK - VRAR
36%
Loosely correlated
+6.92%
NXPL - VRAR
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More