Advertisement
CLSK vs WGS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSK is a Hold and WGS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLSK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWGS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- WGS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLSK’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WGS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLSK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- WGS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -23.26% price change this week, while WGS (@Medical Specialties) price change was -2.04% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -8.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.35%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was -2.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.45%.
Reported Earning Dates
CLSK is expected to report earnings on Dec 17, 2025.
WGS is expected to report earnings on Mar 17, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-8.20% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Medical Specialties (-2.75% weekly)Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.
| CLSK | WGS | CLSK / WGS | |
| Capitalization | 2.74B | 3.86B | 71% |
| EBITDA | 626M | 33.9M | 1,847% |
| Gain YTD | 11.075 | 73.888 | 15% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.90 | 1215.00 | 1% |
| Revenue | 632M | 402M | 157% |
| Total Cash | 916M | 155M | 591% |
| Total Debt | 820M | 113M | 726% |
CLSK | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 95 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 51 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CLSK | WGS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 87% | 10 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 6 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EIPFX | 19.41 | N/A | N/A |
| EIP Growth and Income Investor | |||
| MNOZX | 36.21 | N/A | N/A |
| Manning & Napier Overseas Series Z | |||
| MINGX | 44.00 | -0.02 | -0.05% |
| MFS International Intrinsic Value R3 | |||
| GAOFX | 21.94 | -0.03 | -0.14% |
| JPMorgan Global Allocation R4 | |||
| WBIIX | 15.49 | -0.05 | -0.32% |
| William Blair Instl International Gr | |||
CLSK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSK has been closely correlated with MARA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSK jumps, then MARA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLSK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLSK | 100% | -5.37% | ||
| MARA - CLSK | 82% Closely correlated | -6.57% | ||
| RIOT - CLSK | 79% Closely correlated | -4.23% | ||
| MSTR - CLSK | 74% Closely correlated | -9.82% | ||
| COIN - CLSK | 74% Closely correlated | -1.72% | ||
| HIVE - CLSK | 73% Closely correlated | -11.78% | ||
More | ||||
WGS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WGS has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WGS jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WGS | 100% | +5.30% | ||
| COIN - WGS | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.72% | ||
| CLSK - WGS | 53% Loosely correlated | -5.37% | ||
| RIOT - WGS | 50% Loosely correlated | -4.23% | ||
| COMP - WGS | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| GH - WGS | 30% Poorly correlated | +4.17% | ||
More | ||||