CLSPF
Price
$4.58
Change
+$0.15 (+3.39%)
Updated
Jul 22 closing price
Capitalization
29.39M
NINTF
Price
$2.53
Change
+$0.73 (+40.56%)
Updated
Jul 14 closing price
Capitalization
2.04B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLSPF vs NINTF

Header iconCLSPF vs NINTF Comparison
Open Charts CLSPF vs NINTFBanner chart's image
CANADIAN LIFE COS SPLIT
Price$4.58
Change+$0.15 (+3.39%)
Volume$300
Capitalization29.39M
NINETY ONE
Price$2.53
Change+$0.73 (+40.56%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.04B
CLSPF vs NINTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLSPF vs. NINTF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLSPF is a StrongBuy and NINTF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CLSPF: $4.58 vs. NINTF: $2.53)
Brand notoriety: CLSPF and NINTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLSPF: 47% vs. NINTF: 34%
Market capitalization -- CLSPF: $29.39M vs. NINTF: $2.04B
CLSPF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $29.39M. NINTF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $2.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLSPF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNINTF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CLSPF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • NINTF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CLSPF and NINTF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLSPF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CLSPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

CLSPF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +3.34% price change this week, while NINTF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.57%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.66% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NINTF($2.05B) has a higher market cap than CLSPF($29.4M). NINTF has higher P/E ratio than CLSPF: NINTF (9.24) vs CLSPF (3.31). NINTF YTD gains are higher at: 24.020 vs. CLSPF (-3.983). NINTF has more cash in the bank: 10.3B vs. CLSPF (111M). NINTF has higher revenues than CLSPF: NINTF (746M) vs CLSPF (4.01M).
CLSPFNINTFCLSPF / NINTF
Capitalization29.4M2.05B1%
EBITDAN/A231M-
Gain YTD-3.98324.020-17%
P/E Ratio3.319.2436%
Revenue4.01M746M1%
Total Cash111M10.3B1%
Total DebtN/A103M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSPFNINTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
13%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
7%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLSPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NEXOF18.40N/A
N/A
Nexon Co Ltd.
MSEZ0.07N/A
N/A
Media Sentiment, Inc.
RNSHF29.92N/A
N/A
Renishaw Plc
UNTC27.74-0.01
-0.04%
Unit Corp.
AGXPF0.26N/A
-0.23%
SILVER X MNG CORP.

CLSPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLSPF and QUCT have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLSPF and QUCT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLSPF
1D Price
Change %
CLSPF100%
N/A
QUCT - CLSPF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CION - CLSPF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
BXSL - CLSPF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
ITPC - CLSPF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NINTF - CLSPF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NINTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NINTF has been loosely correlated with TRNLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NINTF jumps, then TRNLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NINTF
1D Price
Change %
NINTF100%
N/A
TRNLY - NINTF
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.67%
ICGUF - NINTF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AGFMF - NINTF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BXSL - NINTF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
BCBNF - NINTF
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.91%
More