CLST
Price
$13.15
Change
-$0.09 (-0.68%)
Updated
Sep 26, 11:09 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
54.63M
CMAKY
Price
$5.36
Change
+$0.10 (+1.90%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
24.58B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLST vs CMAKY

Header iconCLST vs CMAKY Comparison
Open Charts CLST vs CMAKYBanner chart's image
Catalyst Ban
Price$13.15
Change-$0.09 (-0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization54.63M
China Minsheng Banking
Price$5.36
Change+$0.10 (+1.90%)
Volume$505
Capitalization24.58B
CLST vs CMAKY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMAKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLST vs. CMAKY commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLST is a StrongBuy and CMAKY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CLST: $13.20 vs. CMAKY: $5.36)
Brand notoriety: CLST and CMAKY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLST: 153% vs. CMAKY: 73%
Market capitalization -- CLST: $54.63M vs. CMAKY: $24.58B
CLST [@Regional Banks] is valued at $54.63M. CMAKY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $24.58B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $164.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLST’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCMAKY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CLST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CMAKY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMAKY is a better buy in the long-term than CLST.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLST’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CMAKY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CMAKY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLST is a better buy in the short-term than CMAKY.

Price Growth

CLST (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.46% price change this week, while CMAKY (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.48%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.65% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMAKY($24.6B) has a higher market cap than CLST($54.6M). CLST has higher P/E ratio than CMAKY: CLST (24.00) vs CMAKY (5.78). CMAKY YTD gains are higher at: 46.231 vs. CLST (12.150). CMAKY has higher revenues than CLST: CMAKY (142B) vs CLST (11.6M).
CLSTCMAKYCLST / CMAKY
Capitalization54.6M24.6B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD12.15046.23126%
P/E Ratio24.005.78415%
Revenue11.6M142B0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt9.65MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLST vs CMAKY: Fundamental Ratings
CLST
CMAKY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
132
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1263
SMR RATING
1..100
871
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4944
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3816
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CLST's Valuation (81) in the null industry is in the same range as CMAKY (91). This means that CLST’s stock grew similarly to CMAKY’s over the last 12 months.

CLST's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMAKY (63). This means that CLST’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMAKY’s over the last 12 months.

CMAKY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLST (87). This means that CMAKY’s stock grew significantly faster than CLST’s over the last 12 months.

CMAKY's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as CLST (49). This means that CMAKY’s stock grew similarly to CLST’s over the last 12 months.

CMAKY's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as CLST (38). This means that CMAKY’s stock grew similarly to CLST’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSTCMAKY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
43%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
49%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMAKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AEBZY0.340.01
+3.16%
Anadolu Efes Biracilik Ve Malt AS
STBFF32.50N/A
N/A
Suntory Beverage & Food Ltd
HAWLL21.02N/A
N/A
Hawaiian Electric Co., Inc.
LTCH0.12N/A
N/A
Latch, Inc.
IVCTF0.12-0.02
-11.86%
INVICTUS ENERGY LTD.

CLST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLST has been loosely correlated with COFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLST jumps, then COFS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLST
1D Price
Change %
CLST100%
N/A
COFS - CLST
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
UBFO - CLST
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
PNC - CLST
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.66%
FITB - CLST
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
CARE - CLST
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.15%
More

CMAKY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMAKY and PONT have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMAKY and PONT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMAKY
1D Price
Change %
CMAKY100%
N/A
PONT - CMAKY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLST - CMAKY
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNBB - CMAKY
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIXPF - CMAKY
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIWV - CMAKY
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More