It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLST’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFITB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLST’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FITB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CLST (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.10% price change this week, while FITB (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.33% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.15%.
FITB is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
CLST | FITB | CLST / FITB | |
Capitalization | 54.2M | 30.2B | 0% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 11.295 | 9.918 | 114% |
P/E Ratio | 23.82 | 14.41 | 165% |
Revenue | 11.6M | 8.45B | 0% |
Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 9.65M | 17.6B | 0% |
CLST | FITB | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | 12 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 80 Overvalued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 37 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 87 | 6 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 20 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 38 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CLST's Valuation (80) in the null industry is in the same range as FITB (84) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CLST’s stock grew similarly to FITB’s over the last 12 months.
CLST's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as FITB (37) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CLST’s stock grew similarly to FITB’s over the last 12 months.
FITB's SMR Rating (6) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLST (87) in the null industry. This means that FITB’s stock grew significantly faster than CLST’s over the last 12 months.
FITB's Price Growth Rating (20) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CLST (48) in the null industry. This means that FITB’s stock grew similarly to CLST’s over the last 12 months.
FITB's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CLST (40) in the null industry. This means that FITB’s stock grew similarly to CLST’s over the last 12 months.
CLST | FITB | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago47% | 1 day ago63% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago39% | 1 day ago61% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago62% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago38% | 1 day ago66% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago34% | 1 day ago65% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago30% | 1 day ago62% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago34% | 3 days ago67% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago50% | about 1 month ago62% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago41% | 1 day ago61% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago33% | 1 day ago66% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLST has been loosely correlated with COFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLST jumps, then COFS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLST | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CLST | 100% | -0.38% | ||
COFS - CLST | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
UBFO - CLST | 33% Loosely correlated | -0.63% | ||
CARE - CLST | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.46% | ||
PNC - CLST | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.43% | ||
FITB - CLST | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.38% | ||
More |