CLST
Price
$12.38
Change
+$0.03 (+0.24%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
53.99M
UBFO
Price
$8.76
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
133.04M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLST vs UBFO

Header iconCLST vs UBFO Comparison
Open Charts CLST vs UBFOBanner chart's image
Catalyst Ban
Price$12.38
Change+$0.03 (+0.24%)
Volume$357
Capitalization53.99M
United Security Bancshares
Price$8.76
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$15.89K
Capitalization133.04M
CLST vs UBFO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UBFO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLST vs. UBFO commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLST is a Hold and UBFO is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CLST: $12.38 vs. UBFO: $8.76)
Brand notoriety: CLST and UBFO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLST: 4% vs. UBFO: 28%
Market capitalization -- CLST: $53.99M vs. UBFO: $133.04M
CLST [@Regional Banks] is valued at $53.99M. UBFO’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $133.04M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLST’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUBFO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CLST’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UBFO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, UBFO is a better buy in the long-term than CLST.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLST’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UBFO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLST’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • UBFO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UBFO is a better buy in the short-term than CLST.

Price Growth

CLST (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.30% price change this week, while UBFO (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLST is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2025.

UBFO is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.49% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UBFO($133M) has a higher market cap than CLST($54M). CLST has higher P/E ratio than UBFO: CLST (84.57) vs UBFO (6.49). CLST YTD gains are higher at: 5.183 vs. UBFO (-9.714). UBFO has higher revenues than CLST: UBFO (54.8M) vs CLST (9.14M).
CLSTUBFOCLST / UBFO
Capitalization54M133M41%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD5.183-9.714-53%
P/E Ratio84.576.491,303%
Revenue9.14M54.8M17%
Total CashN/A33.2M-
Total DebtN/A74.6M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLST vs UBFO: Fundamental Ratings
CLST
UBFO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8630
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1226
SMR RATING
1..100
8446
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5555
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5313
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a22

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CLST's Valuation (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UBFO (63) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CLST’s stock grew somewhat faster than UBFO’s over the last 12 months.

CLST's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as UBFO (26) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CLST’s stock grew similarly to UBFO’s over the last 12 months.

UBFO's SMR Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLST (84) in the null industry. This means that UBFO’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLST’s over the last 12 months.

UBFO's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CLST (55) in the null industry. This means that UBFO’s stock grew similarly to CLST’s over the last 12 months.

UBFO's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLST (53) in the null industry. This means that UBFO’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLST’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSTUBFO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
52%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UBFO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MVMDF0.02N/A
+7.06%
Mountain Valley MD Holdings Inc.
HNNA12.890.23
+1.82%
Hennessy Advisors
JUTOY23.67N/A
N/A
Jutal Offshore Oil Service Ltd.
UNIRF4.28N/A
N/A
Unibail Rodamco
CHRHF2.30-0.20
-8.00%
CHERVON HLDGS LTD.

CLST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLST has been loosely correlated with UBFO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLST jumps, then UBFO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLST
1D Price
Change %
CLST100%
+0.24%
UBFO - CLST
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NEWT - CLST
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FULTP - CLST
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.33%
CARE - CLST
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.53%
PNC - CLST
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.05%
More

UBFO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UBFO has been loosely correlated with WNEB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UBFO jumps, then WNEB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UBFO
1D Price
Change %
UBFO100%
N/A
WNEB - UBFO
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
EWBC - UBFO
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
WAL - UBFO
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.24%
ZION - UBFO
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
HBAN - UBFO
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.20%
More