It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSEOAY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SEOAY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CLW (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а -6.82% price change this week, while SEOAY (@Pulp & Paper) price change was +1.13% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was -0.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.94%.
CLW is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
SEOAY is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.
The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.
CLW | SEOAY | CLW / SEOAY | |
Capitalization | 719M | 9.64B | 7% |
EBITDA | 274M | 1.96B | 14% |
Gain YTD | -30.011 | -24.209 | 124% |
P/E Ratio | 6.92 | 9.61 | 72% |
Revenue | 2.08B | 10.9B | 19% |
Total Cash | 42M | 1.97B | 2% |
Total Debt | 478M | 5.13B | 9% |
CLW | SEOAY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 15 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 96 Overvalued | 32 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 79 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 87 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 33 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SEOAY's Valuation (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLW (96) in the Pulp And Paper industry. This means that SEOAY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLW’s over the last 12 months.
CLW's Profit vs Risk Rating (79) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as SEOAY (100) in the null industry. This means that CLW’s stock grew similarly to SEOAY’s over the last 12 months.
CLW's SMR Rating (87) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as SEOAY (89) in the null industry. This means that CLW’s stock grew similarly to SEOAY’s over the last 12 months.
SEOAY's Price Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as CLW (64) in the Pulp And Paper industry. This means that SEOAY’s stock grew similarly to CLW’s over the last 12 months.
CLW's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Pulp And Paper industry is in the same range as SEOAY (33) in the null industry. This means that CLW’s stock grew similarly to SEOAY’s over the last 12 months.
CLW | SEOAY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago83% | 1 day ago82% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago80% | 1 day ago68% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 1 day ago64% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 1 day ago62% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago70% | 1 day ago64% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 1 day ago59% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago70% | 1 day ago60% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago72% | 27 days ago61% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% | 1 day ago56% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago50% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
SSGVX | 121.29 | N/A | N/A |
State Street Glb All Cap Eq ex-US Idx | |||
TOVIX | 17.81 | -0.05 | -0.28% |
American Beacon EAM Int Small Cap R5 | |||
SPINX | 25.53 | -0.10 | -0.39% |
SEI S&P 500 Index A (SIIT) | |||
FAGNX | 45.26 | -0.37 | -0.81% |
Fidelity Advisor Energy M | |||
LSRCX | 1.98 | -1.74 | -46.81% |
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value C |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CLW and MERC have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLW and MERC's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLW | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CLW | 100% | -1.25% | ||
MERC - CLW | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.31% | ||
SLVM - CLW | 24% Poorly correlated | -2.16% | ||
MONDY - CLW | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.36% | ||
SEOAY - CLW | 14% Poorly correlated | +0.78% | ||
MATV - CLW | 12% Poorly correlated | -4.29% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEOAY has been closely correlated with UPMMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SEOAY jumps, then UPMMY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SEOAY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SEOAY | 100% | +0.78% | ||
UPMMY - SEOAY | 70% Closely correlated | -0.69% | ||
MONDY - SEOAY | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.36% | ||
MERC - SEOAY | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.31% | ||
UPMKF - SEOAY | 27% Poorly correlated | -5.79% | ||
SLVM - SEOAY | 25% Poorly correlated | -2.16% | ||
More |