Ad is loading...
CLWFX vs VIGRX
CLWFX vs VIGRX Comparison
Open Charts CLWFX vs VIGRX
Columbia Large Cap Growth Inst2
Price$66.83
Change+$1.24 (+1.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.03B
Vanguard Growth Index Investor
Price$185.55
Change+$3.72 (+2.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.76B
CLWFX vs VIGRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLWFX vs. VIGRX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLWFX is a Buy and VIGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIGRX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. CLWFX (5.03B). VIGRX pays higher dividends than CLWFX: VIGRX (0.39) vs CLWFX (0.00). CLWFX was incepted earlier than VIGRX: CLWFX (14 years) vs VIGRX (32 years). CLWFX (0.71) is less costly to investors than VIGRX (0.17). CLWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. VIGRX (5.00). CLWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIGRX: CLWFX (0) vs VIGRX (3000). VIGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.03 vs. CLWFX (-4.26). VIGRX return over 5 years is better than : 110.62 vs. CLWFX (54.77).
| CLWFX | VIGRX | CLWFX / VIGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.17 | 418% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 0.17 | 418% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.585 | -13.943 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.03B | 261B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.39 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.26 | 2.03 | -210% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.27 | 30.35 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.77 | 110.62 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.91 | 225.76 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...