CMA
Price
$55.98
Change
-$0.06 (-0.11%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
7.17B
68 days until earnings call
FNWB
Price
$9.86
Change
-$0.10 (-1.00%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
149.01M
73 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CMA vs FNWB

Header iconCMA vs FNWB Comparison
Open Charts CMA vs FNWBBanner chart's image
Comerica
Price$55.98
Change-$0.06 (-0.11%)
Volume$652.16K
Capitalization7.17B
First Northwest Ban
Price$9.86
Change-$0.10 (-1.00%)
Volume$4.55K
Capitalization149.01M
CMA vs FNWB Comparison Chart
Loading...
CMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNWB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMA vs. FNWB commentary
May 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMA is a StrongBuy and FNWB is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 11, 2025
Stock price -- (CMA: $55.98 vs. FNWB: $9.86)
Brand notoriety: CMA and FNWB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMA: 31% vs. FNWB: 37%
Market capitalization -- CMA: $7.17B vs. FNWB: $149.01M
CMA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $7.17B. FNWB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $149.01M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFNWB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CMA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FNWB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMA is a better buy in the long-term than FNWB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNWB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FNWB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMA is a better buy in the short-term than FNWB.

Price Growth

CMA (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.82% price change this week, while FNWB (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMA is expected to report earnings on Jul 18, 2025.

FNWB is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.64% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMA($7.17B) has a higher market cap than FNWB($149M). FNWB has higher P/E ratio than CMA: FNWB (60.69) vs CMA (8.40). FNWB YTD gains are higher at: -2.071 vs. CMA (-8.350). CMA has more cash in the bank: 1.44B vs. FNWB (20.6M). FNWB has less debt than CMA: FNWB (321M) vs CMA (9.77B). CMA has higher revenues than FNWB: CMA (3.59B) vs FNWB (65.5M).
CMAFNWBCMA / FNWB
Capitalization7.17B149M4,811%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-8.350-2.071403%
P/E Ratio8.4060.6914%
Revenue3.59B65.5M5,484%
Total Cash1.44B20.6M7,005%
Total Debt9.77B321M3,044%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMA vs FNWB: Fundamental Ratings
CMA
FNWB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1958
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5591
SMR RATING
1..100
721
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5974
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
472
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a19

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMA's Valuation (79) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as FNWB (85) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CMA’s stock grew similarly to FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

CMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNWB (91) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

CMA's SMR Rating (7) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as FNWB (21) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CMA’s stock grew similarly to FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

CMA's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as FNWB (74) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CMA’s stock grew similarly to FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

FNWB's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMA (47) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FNWB’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMAFNWB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNWB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EFAV82.530.61
+0.74%
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF
THYF51.090.06
+0.11%
T. Rowe Price U.S. High Yield ETF
TSI4.90-0.02
-0.41%
TCW Strategic Income Fund
RAYD33.08-0.15
-0.45%
Rayliant Quantitative Dev Mkt Eq ETF
TPOR20.84-0.19
-0.90%
Direxion Dly Transp Bull 3X Shrs ETF