CMA
Price
$68.86
Change
-$1.74 (-2.46%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
9.07B
41 days until earnings call
FNWB
Price
$7.10
Change
-$0.10 (-1.39%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
63.21M
46 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMA vs FNWB

Header iconCMA vs FNWB Comparison
Open Charts CMA vs FNWBBanner chart's image
Comerica
Price$68.86
Change-$1.74 (-2.46%)
Volume$1.21M
Capitalization9.07B
First Northwest Ban
Price$7.10
Change-$0.10 (-1.39%)
Volume$44.4K
Capitalization63.21M
CMA vs FNWB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNWB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMA vs. FNWB commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMA is a Buy and FNWB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CMA: $68.86 vs. FNWB: $7.10)
Brand notoriety: CMA and FNWB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMA: 51% vs. FNWB: 167%
Market capitalization -- CMA: $9.07B vs. FNWB: $63.21M
CMA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $9.07B. FNWB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $63.21M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.95B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFNWB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FNWB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMA is a better buy in the long-term than FNWB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNWB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FNWB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMA is a better buy in the short-term than FNWB.

Price Growth

CMA (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.44% price change this week, while FNWB (@Regional Banks) price change was -4.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMA is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.

FNWB is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.44% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMA($9.07B) has a higher market cap than FNWB($63.2M). FNWB has higher P/E ratio than CMA: FNWB (43.38) vs CMA (13.22). CMA YTD gains are higher at: 14.146 vs. FNWB (-29.483). CMA has more cash in the bank: 1.08B vs. FNWB (16.8M). FNWB has less debt than CMA: FNWB (360M) vs CMA (8.69B). CMA has higher revenues than FNWB: CMA (3.31B) vs FNWB (65.2M).
CMAFNWBCMA / FNWB
Capitalization9.07B63.2M14,358%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD14.146-29.483-48%
P/E Ratio13.2243.3830%
Revenue3.31B65.2M5,083%
Total Cash1.08B16.8M6,446%
Total Debt8.69B360M2,413%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMA vs FNWB: Fundamental Ratings
CMA
FNWB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5656
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
59100
SMR RATING
1..100
991
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1586
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
373
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMA's Valuation (88) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as FNWB (88) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CMA’s stock grew similarly to FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

CMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNWB (100) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

CMA's SMR Rating (9) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FNWB (91) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CMA’s stock grew significantly faster than FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

CMA's Price Growth Rating (15) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FNWB (86) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CMA’s stock grew significantly faster than FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

FNWB's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMA (37) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FNWB’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMAFNWB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNWB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WSHCX64.670.15
+0.23%
American Funds Washington Mutual C
BDSIX19.75N/A
N/A
BlackRock Advantage Small Cap Core Instl
JEVCX10.28N/A
N/A
JHancock Disciplined Value Em Mkts Eq C
JACLX18.81N/A
N/A
JHancock Mid Cap Growth C
MBNAX32.05-0.06
-0.19%
NYLI Balanced Class A