It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CMA’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileOCFC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CMA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OCFC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CMA (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.66% price change this week, while OCFC (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.58% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.82%.
CMA is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.
OCFC is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
CMA | OCFC | CMA / OCFC | |
Capitalization | 7.17B | 932M | 769% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 17.117 | 9.410 | 182% |
P/E Ratio | 8.40 | 9.30 | 90% |
Revenue | 3.59B | 399M | 900% |
Total Cash | 1.44B | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 9.77B | 974M | 1,003% |
CMA | OCFC | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 66 Overvalued | 28 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 75 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 8 | 15 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 12 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | 14 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
OCFC's Valuation (28) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMA (66) in the Major Banks industry. This means that OCFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMA’s over the last 12 months.
CMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as OCFC (100) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CMA’s stock grew similarly to OCFC’s over the last 12 months.
CMA's SMR Rating (8) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as OCFC (15) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CMA’s stock grew similarly to OCFC’s over the last 12 months.
CMA's Price Growth Rating (12) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OCFC (48) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than OCFC’s over the last 12 months.
CMA's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as OCFC (14) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that CMA’s stock grew similarly to OCFC’s over the last 12 months.
CMA | OCFC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago69% | 2 days ago78% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 2 days ago56% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | 2 days ago71% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 2 days ago73% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 2 days ago65% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% | 2 days ago61% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 7 days ago63% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago66% | 5 days ago65% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago60% | 2 days ago74% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago69% | 2 days ago56% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OCFC has been closely correlated with WSFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OCFC jumps, then WSFS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OCFC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
OCFC | 100% | +3.51% | ||
WSFS - OCFC | 87% Closely correlated | +1.83% | ||
NWBI - OCFC | 87% Closely correlated | +3.14% | ||
ABCB - OCFC | 87% Closely correlated | +3.15% | ||
SBCF - OCFC | 87% Closely correlated | +3.38% | ||
FRME - OCFC | 87% Closely correlated | +3.80% | ||
More |