OCFC
Price
$19.77
Change
+$0.29 (+1.49%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
1.91B
73 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UBSI
Price
$49.27
Change
+$0.21 (+0.43%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
6.71B
67 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

OCFC vs UBSI

OCFC vs UBSI Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
OCFC vs. UBSI commentary
Aug 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is OCFC is a StrongBuy and UBSI is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2026
Stock price -- (OCFC: $19.77 vs. UBSI: $49.27)
Brand notoriety: OCFC and UBSI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: OCFC: 63% vs. UBSI: 32%
Market capitalization -- OCFC: $1.91B vs. UBSI: $6.71B
OCFC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.91B. UBSI’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $6.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

OCFC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUBSI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • OCFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UBSI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UBSI is a better buy in the long-term than OCFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

OCFC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UBSI’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • OCFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UBSI’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OCFC is a better buy in the short-term than UBSI.

Price Growth

OCFC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.86% price change this week, while UBSI (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

OCFC is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

UBSI is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.33% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UBSI($6.71B) has a higher market cap than OCFC($1.91B). OCFC has higher P/E ratio than UBSI: OCFC (24.41) vs UBSI (13.43). UBSI YTD gains are higher at: 30.665 vs. OCFC (13.677). UBSI has less debt than OCFC: UBSI (626M) vs OCFC (1.44B). UBSI has higher revenues than OCFC: UBSI (1.26B) vs OCFC (438M).
OCFCUBSIOCFC / UBSI
Capitalization1.91B6.71B28%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD13.67730.66545%
P/E Ratio24.4113.43182%
Revenue438M1.26B35%
Total CashN/A269M-
Total Debt1.44B626M229%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OCFC vs UBSI: Fundamental Ratings
OCFC
UBSI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7886
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7334
SMR RATING
1..100
6225
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4944
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
948
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OCFC's Valuation (18) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as UBSI (48) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that OCFC’s stock grew similarly to UBSI’s over the last 12 months.

UBSI's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OCFC (73) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that UBSI’s stock grew somewhat faster than OCFC’s over the last 12 months.

UBSI's SMR Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OCFC (62) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that UBSI’s stock grew somewhat faster than OCFC’s over the last 12 months.

UBSI's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as OCFC (49) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that UBSI’s stock grew similarly to OCFC’s over the last 12 months.

OCFC's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UBSI (48) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that OCFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than UBSI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
OCFCUBSI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
OCFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UBSI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NCZ16.160.07
+0.44%
Virtus Convertible & Income Fund II
CLOI52.870.02
+0.04%
VanEck CLO ETF
TRSY30.180.01
+0.03%
Xtrackers US 0-1 Year Treasury ETF
DEXC78.52-0.17
-0.21%
Dimensional Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity ETF
DRAI34.16-0.10
-0.29%
Draco Evolution AI ETF

OCFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OCFC has been closely correlated with DCOM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OCFC jumps, then DCOM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OCFC
1D Price
Change %
OCFC100%
+1.49%
DCOM - OCFC
79%
Closely correlated
-0.58%
BFST - OCFC
77%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
HOPE - OCFC
77%
Closely correlated
-0.34%
UBSI - OCFC
76%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
PGC - OCFC
76%
Closely correlated
+0.67%
More