It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CMA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePPERY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CMA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PPERY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CMA (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.78% price change this week, while PPERY (@Regional Banks) price change was -6.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -3.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.19%.
CMA is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.
PPERY is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2025.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
CMA | PPERY | CMA / PPERY | |
Capitalization | 7.17B | 34.9B | 21% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 21.571 | -1.613 | -1,337% |
P/E Ratio | 8.40 | 15.31 | 55% |
Revenue | 3.59B | 116.68T | 0% |
Total Cash | 1.44B | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 9.77B | 108.28T | 0% |
CMA | PPERY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 55 | 15 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 56 Fair valued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 78 | 1 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 9 | 1 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 9 | 82 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CMA's Valuation (56) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PPERY (92) in the null industry. This means that CMA’s stock grew somewhat faster than PPERY’s over the last 12 months.
PPERY's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CMA (78) in the Major Banks industry. This means that PPERY’s stock grew significantly faster than CMA’s over the last 12 months.
PPERY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as CMA (9) in the Major Banks industry. This means that PPERY’s stock grew similarly to CMA’s over the last 12 months.
CMA's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as PPERY (61) in the null industry. This means that CMA’s stock grew similarly to PPERY’s over the last 12 months.
CMA's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for PPERY (82) in the null industry. This means that CMA’s stock grew significantly faster than PPERY’s over the last 12 months.
CMA | PPERY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago83% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago83% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago61% | 2 days ago63% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago60% | 2 days ago68% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 2 days ago61% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago66% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago69% | 10 days ago75% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 6 days ago61% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago73% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago55% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
UBPIX | 13.26 | 0.25 | +1.92% |
ProFunds UltraLatin America Inv | |||
FTCWX | 13.63 | -0.01 | -0.07% |
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 20% C | |||
TGDIX | 16.92 | -0.17 | -0.99% |
TCW Relative Value Large Cap I | |||
RPFIX | 11.51 | -0.16 | -1.37% |
Royce Premier Instl | |||
VYRDX | 17.57 | -0.27 | -1.51% |
VY® Columbia Small Cap Value II R6 |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PPERY has been loosely correlated with BKRKY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PPERY jumps, then BKRKY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PPERY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PPERY | 100% | -1.54% | ||
BKRKY - PPERY | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.83% | ||
PBCRY - PPERY | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.38% | ||
PBCRF - PPERY | 28% Poorly correlated | -8.44% | ||
CMA - PPERY | 23% Poorly correlated | -3.10% | ||
SBCF - PPERY | 22% Poorly correlated | -3.26% | ||
More |