CMA
Price
$62.32
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
One day until earnings call
RF
Price
$23.98
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
One day until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CMA vs RF

Header iconCMA vs RF Comparison
Open Charts CMA vs RFBanner chart's image
Comerica
Price$62.32
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.56M
CapitalizationN/A
Regions Financial
Price$23.98
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$7.57M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CMA vs RF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
RF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
CMA vs. RF commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMA is a Buy and RF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CMA: $62.32 vs. RF: $23.98)
Brand notoriety: CMA: Not notable vs. RF: Notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMA: 87% vs. RF: 108%
Market capitalization -- CMA: $7.17B vs. RF: $18.9B
CMA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $7.17B. RF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $18.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMA’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileRF’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • CMA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • RF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, RF is a better buy in the long-term than CMA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CMA and RF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CMA (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.04% price change this week, while RF (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMA is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.

RF is expected to report earnings on Jan 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.91% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RF($18.9B) has a higher market cap than CMA($7.17B). RF has higher P/E ratio than CMA: RF (9.74) vs CMA (8.40). RF YTD gains are higher at: 28.300 vs. CMA (16.370). RF has more cash in the bank: 1.55B vs. CMA (1.44B). RF has less debt than CMA: RF (2.33B) vs CMA (9.77B). RF has higher revenues than CMA: RF (7.57B) vs CMA (3.59B).
CMARFCMA / RF
Capitalization7.17B18.9B38%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.37028.30058%
P/E Ratio8.409.7486%
Revenue3.59B7.57B47%
Total Cash1.44B1.55B93%
Total Debt9.77B2.33B419%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMA vs RF: Fundamental Ratings
CMA
RF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2373
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7627
SMR RATING
1..100
86
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1516
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
715
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMA's Valuation (66) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as RF (88). This means that CMA’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

RF's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMA (76). This means that RF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMA’s over the last 12 months.

RF's SMR Rating (6) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CMA (8). This means that RF’s stock grew similarly to CMA’s over the last 12 months.

CMA's Price Growth Rating (15) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as RF (16). This means that CMA’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

CMA's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as RF (15). This means that CMA’s stock grew similarly to RF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMARF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
RF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME21.660.39
+1.83%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X67612.720000571.609400
+0.85%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA221.331.76
+0.80%
Tesla
SPY582.302.52
+0.43%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL231.78-2.07
-0.89%
Apple

CMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMA has been closely correlated with ZION. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CMA jumps, then ZION could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMA
1D Price
Change %
CMA100%
+0.74%
ZION - CMA
84%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
RF - CMA
81%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
PNFP - CMA
80%
Closely correlated
+4.91%
ABCB - CMA
79%
Closely correlated
+2.26%
KEY - CMA
79%
Closely correlated
+1.20%
More

RF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RF has been closely correlated with HBAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RF jumps, then HBAN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RF
1D Price
Change %
RF100%
+0.93%
HBAN - RF
86%
Closely correlated
+1.60%
FITB - RF
86%
Closely correlated
+0.74%
MTB - RF
84%
Closely correlated
+1.87%
ASB - RF
83%
Closely correlated
+2.23%
ZION - RF
83%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
More