CMA
Price
$69.61
Change
+$1.15 (+1.68%)
Updated
Sep 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.94B
29 days until earnings call
TFC
Price
$45.37
Change
+$0.81 (+1.82%)
Updated
Sep 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
57.46B
29 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMA vs TFC

Header iconCMA vs TFC Comparison
Open Charts CMA vs TFCBanner chart's image
Comerica
Price$69.61
Change+$1.15 (+1.68%)
Volume$17.98K
Capitalization8.94B
Truist Financial
Price$45.37
Change+$0.81 (+1.82%)
Volume$61.92K
Capitalization57.46B
CMA vs TFC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMA vs. TFC commentary
Sep 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMA is a Hold and TFC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CMA: $69.59 vs. TFC: $45.38)
Brand notoriety: CMA and TFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMA: 84% vs. TFC: 120%
Market capitalization -- CMA: $8.94B vs. TFC: $57.46B
CMA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $8.94B. TFC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $57.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $168.53B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTFC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CMA and TFC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TFC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TFC is a better buy in the short-term than CMA.

Price Growth

CMA (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.51% price change this week, while TFC (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMA is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.

TFC is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.27% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFC($57.5B) has a higher market cap than CMA($8.94B). CMA has higher P/E ratio than TFC: CMA (13.36) vs TFC (12.30). CMA YTD gains are higher at: 16.530 vs. TFC (8.521). TFC has more cash in the bank: 5.16B vs. CMA (1.24B). CMA has less debt than TFC: CMA (8.69B) vs TFC (61.1B). TFC has higher revenues than CMA: TFC (20B) vs CMA (3.31B).
CMATFCCMA / TFC
Capitalization8.94B57.5B16%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.5308.521194%
P/E Ratio13.3612.30109%
Revenue3.31B20B17%
Total Cash1.24B5.16B24%
Total Debt8.69B61.1B14%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMA vs TFC: Fundamental Ratings
CMA
TFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5963
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5866
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1933
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4444
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TFC's Valuation (74) in the null industry is in the same range as CMA (88) in the Major Banks industry. This means that TFC’s stock grew similarly to CMA’s over the last 12 months.

CMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as TFC (66) in the null industry. This means that CMA’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

TFC's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as CMA (9) in the Major Banks industry. This means that TFC’s stock grew similarly to CMA’s over the last 12 months.

CMA's Price Growth Rating (19) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as TFC (33) in the null industry. This means that CMA’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

CMA's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as TFC (44) in the null industry. This means that CMA’s stock grew similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMATFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HPI17.160.14
+0.82%
John Hancock Preferred Income Fund
IYF126.110.99
+0.79%
iShares US Financials ETF
SDCP26.010.01
+0.03%
Virtus Newfleet Short Dur Cor Pls Bd ETF
PIEQ31.33-0.03
-0.10%
Principal International Equity ETF
OWNS17.64-0.04
-0.20%
CCM Affordable Housing MBS ETF