CMAKY
Price
$5.35
Change
-$0.16 (-2.90%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
Capitalization
24.37B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
CNAF
Price
$8.15
Change
+$0.15 (+1.88%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
23.32M
4 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMAKY vs CNAF

Header iconCMAKY vs CNAF Comparison
Open Charts CMAKY vs CNAFBanner chart's image
China Minsheng Banking
Price$5.35
Change-$0.16 (-2.90%)
Volume$1.1K
Capitalization24.37B
Commercial National Financial Corp. (PA)
Price$8.15
Change+$0.15 (+1.88%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization23.32M
CMAKY vs CNAF Comparison Chart in %
CMAKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CNAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMAKY vs. CNAF commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMAKY is a Hold and CNAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CMAKY: $5.35 vs. CNAF: $8.15)
Brand notoriety: CMAKY and CNAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMAKY: 156% vs. CNAF: 45%
Market capitalization -- CMAKY: $24.37B vs. CNAF: $23.32M
CMAKY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $24.37B. CNAF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $23.32M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $175.05B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMAKY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCNAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CMAKY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CNAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMAKY is a better buy in the long-term than CNAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMAKY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CNAF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMAKY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CNAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CMAKY and CNAF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CMAKY (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.60% price change this week, while CNAF (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNAF is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.16% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMAKY($24.4B) has a higher market cap than CNAF($23.3M). CNAF has higher P/E ratio than CMAKY: CNAF (13.81) vs CMAKY (5.78). CMAKY YTD gains are higher at: 45.958 vs. CNAF (26.405). CMAKY has higher revenues than CNAF: CMAKY (142B) vs CNAF (14.6M).
CMAKYCNAFCMAKY / CNAF
Capitalization24.4B23.3M104,721%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD45.95826.405174%
P/E Ratio5.7813.8142%
Revenue142B14.6M972,603%
Total CashN/A6.72M-
Total DebtN/A32.9M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMAKY vs CNAF: Fundamental Ratings
CMAKY
CNAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
51100
SMR RATING
1..100
180
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4948
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1825
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
508

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CNAF's Valuation (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMAKY (92). This means that CNAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMAKY’s over the last 12 months.

CMAKY's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNAF (100). This means that CMAKY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNAF’s over the last 12 months.

CMAKY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CNAF (80). This means that CMAKY’s stock grew significantly faster than CNAF’s over the last 12 months.

CNAF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as CMAKY (49). This means that CNAF’s stock grew similarly to CMAKY’s over the last 12 months.

CMAKY's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as CNAF (25). This means that CMAKY’s stock grew similarly to CNAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMAKYCNAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMAKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CNAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CHRUF5.35N/A
N/A
CHORUS LTD.
SLMUF11.00N/A
N/A
Slam Corp.
OROVF16.80N/A
N/A
Orient Overseas International Ltd.
TRUX79.50-0.25
-0.31%
Truxton Corp
JPOTF0.10N/A
-1.90%
Jackpot Digital Inc.

CMAKY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMAKY and PONT have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMAKY and PONT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMAKY
1D Price
Change %
CMAKY100%
N/A
PONT - CMAKY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLST - CMAKY
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNBB - CMAKY
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIXPF - CMAKY
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.78%
CIWV - CMAKY
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CNAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CNAF and CMTDF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CNAF and CMTDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNAF
1D Price
Change %
CNAF100%
+1.87%
CMTDF - CNAF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIXPF - CNAF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.78%
CMAKY - CNAF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNBB - CNAF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CKHGY - CNAF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
More