CMAKY
Price
$6.53
Change
+$0.13 (+2.03%)
Updated
Jul 10 closing price
Capitalization
23.21B
PONT
Price
$530.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Mar 11 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

CMAKY vs PONT

Header iconCMAKY vs PONT Comparison
Open Charts CMAKY vs PONTBanner chart's image
China Minsheng Banking
Price$6.53
Change+$0.13 (+2.03%)
Volume$2.67K
Capitalization23.21B
Pontiac Ban
Price$530.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1
CapitalizationN/A
CMAKY vs PONT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CMAKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PONT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CMAKY vs. PONT commentary
Jul 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMAKY is a StrongBuy and PONT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 13, 2025
Stock price -- (CMAKY: $6.53 vs. PONT: $524.71)
Brand notoriety: CMAKY and PONT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CMAKY: 163% vs. PONT: 100%
Market capitalization -- CMAKY: $23.21B vs. PONT: $0
CMAKY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $23.21B. PONT’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CMAKY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePONT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CMAKY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PONT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMAKY is a better buy in the long-term than PONT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CMAKY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PONT’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CMAKY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PONT’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMAKY is a better buy in the short-term than PONT.

Price Growth

CMAKY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +25.58% price change this week, while PONT (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

CMAKY is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.07% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMAKY YTD gains are higher at: 72.029 vs. PONT (0.000).
CMAKYPONTCMAKY / PONT
Capitalization23.2BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD72.0290.000-
P/E Ratio3.71N/A-
Revenue143BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt668BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CMAKY vs PONT: Fundamental Ratings
CMAKY
PONT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4677
SMR RATING
1..100
150
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5050
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
971
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a44

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMAKY's Valuation (18) in the null industry is in the same range as PONT (35). This means that CMAKY’s stock grew similarly to PONT’s over the last 12 months.

CMAKY's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as PONT (77). This means that CMAKY’s stock grew similarly to PONT’s over the last 12 months.

CMAKY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PONT (50). This means that CMAKY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PONT’s over the last 12 months.

CMAKY's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as PONT (50). This means that CMAKY’s stock grew similarly to PONT’s over the last 12 months.

CMAKY's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PONT (71). This means that CMAKY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PONT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CMAKYPONT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
12%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CMAKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PONT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LOAN5.39-0.01
-0.19%
Manhattan Bridge Capital
BBCP6.88-0.07
-1.01%
Concrete Pumping Holdings
GTI0.09N/A
-1.12%
Graphjet Technology
G44.31-0.99
-2.19%
Genpact Limited
AFYA15.66-0.36
-2.25%
Afya Limited

CMAKY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMAKY and PONT have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMAKY and PONT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMAKY
1D Price
Change %
CMAKY100%
N/A
PONT - CMAKY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLST - CMAKY
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
CNBB - CMAKY
16%
Poorly correlated
+1.85%
CIXPF - CMAKY
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIWV - CMAKY
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PONT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PONT has been loosely correlated with BPIRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PONT jumps, then BPIRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PONT
1D Price
Change %
PONT100%
N/A
BPIRF - PONT
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CNBB - PONT
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.85%
GSBX - PONT
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFMH - PONT
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KBCSF - PONT
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More