Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMALX vs RLBCX
CMALX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts CMALX vs RLBCX
Crawford Multi-Asset Income
Price$26.37
Change-$0.32 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets143.89M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$34.64
Change-$0.39 (-1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets240.4B
CMALX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMALX vs. RLBCX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMALX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 240B vs. CMALX (144M). CMALX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: CMALX (4.05) vs RLBCX (1.70). CMALX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: CMALX (8 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). CMALX (1.24) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). RLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CMALX (19.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMALX: RLBCX (250) vs CMALX (10000). CMALX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.13 vs. RLBCX (3.98). CMALX return over 5 years is better than : 56.63 vs. RLBCX (36.15).
| CMALX | RLBCX | CMALX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.89 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.89 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.141 | 1.792 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 144M | 240B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.05 | 1.70 | 239% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.13 | 3.98 | 204% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.76 | 22.56 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.63 | 36.15 | 157% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 49.59 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers