Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMALX vs RLBCX
CMALX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts CMALX vs RLBCX
Crawford Multi-Asset Income
Price$26.90
Change+$0.02 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets165.56M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$39.17
Change+$0.27 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.39B
CMALX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMALX vs. RLBCX commentary
Oct 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMALX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 268B vs. CMALX (166M). CMALX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: CMALX (4.03) vs RLBCX (1.49). CMALX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: CMALX (8 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). CMALX (1.24) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). RLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CMALX (19.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMALX: RLBCX (250) vs CMALX (10000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.61 vs. CMALX (1.84). CMALX return over 5 years is better than : 52.50 vs. RLBCX (42.49).
| CMALX | RLBCX | CMALX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.89 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.89 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.983 | 15.604 | 32% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 166M | 268B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.03 | 1.49 | 271% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.84 | 10.61 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.22 | 47.62 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.50 | 42.49 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 71.53 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement