Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMALX vs RLBCX
CMALX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts CMALX vs RLBCX
Crawford Multi-Asset Income
Price$27.24
Change+$0.04 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.98M
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.71
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.73B
CMALX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMALX vs. RLBCX commentary
Oct 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMALX is a Hold and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. CMALX (165M). CMALX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: CMALX (4.03) vs RLBCX (1.49). CMALX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: CMALX (8 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). CMALX (1.24) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). RLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CMALX (19.00). RLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMALX: RLBCX (250) vs CMALX (10000). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.49 vs. CMALX (4.42). CMALX return over 5 years is better than : 57.28 vs. RLBCX (43.12).
| CMALX | RLBCX | CMALX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.89 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.89 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.310 | 14.246 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 165M | 266B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.03 | 1.49 | 271% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.42 | 9.49 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.92 | 45.94 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.28 | 43.12 | 133% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 75.22 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers