Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs EASCX
CMBFX vs EASCX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs EASCX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.71
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets296.56M
Eaton Vance SC Municipal Income A
Price$8.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets199.47M
CMBFX vs EASCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. EASCX commentary
Nov 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and EASCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 297M vs. EASCX (199M). EASCX pays higher dividends than CMBFX: EASCX (3.48) vs CMBFX (2.45). CMBFX was incepted earlier than EASCX: CMBFX (41 years) vs EASCX (32 years). EASCX (0.71) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). EASCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. CMBFX (12.00). EASCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMBFX: EASCX (1000) vs CMBFX (2000). CMBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.50 vs. EASCX (1.99). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.86 vs. EASCX (0.58).
| CMBFX | EASCX | CMBFX / EASCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.71 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.71 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.796 | 2.691 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 297M | 199M | 149% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.45 | 3.48 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.50 | 1.99 | 176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.13 | 10.04 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.86 | 0.58 | 493% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.70 | 5.64 | 296% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers