Ad is loading...
CMBFX vs ECMOX
CMBFX vs ECMOX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs ECMOX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.39
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets288.85M
Eaton Vance MO Municipal Income C
Price$9.28
Change-$0.02 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.34M
CMBFX vs ECMOX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. ECMOX commentary
May 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and ECMOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 289M vs. ECMOX (82.3M). ECMOX pays higher dividends than CMBFX: ECMOX (2.79) vs CMBFX (2.45). CMBFX was incepted earlier than ECMOX: CMBFX (41 years) vs ECMOX (19 years). ECMOX (1.46) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). ECMOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. CMBFX (13.00). ECMOX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMBFX: ECMOX (1000) vs CMBFX (2000). CMBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.64 vs. ECMOX (0.49). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.56 vs. ECMOX (-3.73).
| CMBFX | ECMOX | CMBFX / ECMOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.46 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.46 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.238 | -1.220 | 20% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 289M | 82.3M | 351% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.45 | 2.79 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.64 | 0.49 | 334% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.61 | 1.59 | 353% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.56 | -3.73 | -69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.83 | -2.99 | -462% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers