Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs ECMOX
CMBFX vs ECMOX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs ECMOX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.64
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets292.19M
Eaton Vance MO Municipal Income C
Price$9.52
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets85.85M
CMBFX vs ECMOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. ECMOX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and ECMOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 292M vs. ECMOX (85.9M). ECMOX pays higher dividends than CMBFX: ECMOX (2.77) vs CMBFX (2.48). CMBFX was incepted earlier than ECMOX: CMBFX (41 years) vs ECMOX (20 years). ECMOX (1.46) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). ECMOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. CMBFX (13.00). ECMOX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMBFX: ECMOX (1000) vs CMBFX (2000). CMBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.06 vs. ECMOX (0.97). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.34 vs. ECMOX (-3.50).
| CMBFX | ECMOX | CMBFX / ECMOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.46 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.46 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.745 | 2.060 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 292M | 85.9M | 340% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.48 | 2.77 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.06 | 0.97 | 213% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.23 | 7.39 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.34 | -3.50 | -67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.73 | 1.00 | 1,678% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement