Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs ECMOX
CMBFX vs ECMOX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs ECMOX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.71
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets296.56M
Eaton Vance MO Municipal Income C
Price$9.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.24M
CMBFX vs ECMOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. ECMOX commentary
Nov 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and ECMOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 297M vs. ECMOX (92.2M). ECMOX pays higher dividends than CMBFX: ECMOX (2.66) vs CMBFX (2.45). CMBFX was incepted earlier than ECMOX: CMBFX (41 years) vs ECMOX (20 years). ECMOX (1.46) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). ECMOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. CMBFX (12.00). ECMOX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMBFX: ECMOX (1000) vs CMBFX (2000). CMBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.50 vs. ECMOX (2.31). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.86 vs. ECMOX (-3.21).
| CMBFX | ECMOX | CMBFX / ECMOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.46 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.46 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.796 | 3.134 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 297M | 92.2M | 322% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.45 | 2.66 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.50 | 2.31 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.13 | 8.87 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.86 | -3.21 | -89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.70 | 1.28 | 1,301% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers