Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs ECMOX
CMBFX vs ECMOX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs ECMOX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.46
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets286.36M
Eaton Vance MO Municipal Income C
Price$9.32
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets83.3M
CMBFX vs ECMOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. ECMOX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and ECMOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 286M vs. ECMOX (83.3M). ECMOX pays higher dividends than CMBFX: ECMOX (2.78) vs CMBFX (2.46). CMBFX was incepted earlier than ECMOX: CMBFX (41 years) vs ECMOX (19 years). ECMOX (1.46) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). ECMOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. CMBFX (13.00). ECMOX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMBFX: ECMOX (1000) vs CMBFX (2000). CMBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.94 vs. ECMOX (0.29). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 1.08 vs. ECMOX (-5.53).
| CMBFX | ECMOX | CMBFX / ECMOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.46 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.46 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.716 | -0.546 | -131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 286M | 83.3M | 343% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.46 | 2.78 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.94 | 0.29 | 659% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.16 | 2.81 | 219% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.08 | -5.53 | -19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.90 | -1.49 | -1,001% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement