Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs ECNCX
CMBFX vs ECNCX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs ECNCX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.71
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets296.56M
Eaton Vance NC Municipal Income C
Price$9.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.93M
CMBFX vs ECNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. ECNCX commentary
Nov 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and ECNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 297M vs. ECNCX (245M). ECNCX (2.47) and CMBFX (2.45) have matching dividends . CMBFX was incepted earlier than ECNCX: CMBFX (41 years) vs ECNCX (20 years). ECNCX (1.45) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). ECNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. CMBFX (12.00). ECNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMBFX: ECNCX (1000) vs CMBFX (2000). CMBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.50 vs. ECNCX (1.89). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.86 vs. ECNCX (-2.01).
| CMBFX | ECNCX | CMBFX / ECNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.45 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.45 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.796 | 2.825 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 297M | 245M | 121% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.45 | 2.47 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.50 | 1.89 | 185% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.13 | 8.40 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.86 | -2.01 | -142% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.70 | 0.74 | 2,250% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers