Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs ECNCX
CMBFX vs ECNCX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs ECNCX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.64
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets292.19M
Eaton Vance NC Municipal Income C
Price$8.96
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets230.53M
CMBFX vs ECNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. ECNCX commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and ECNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 292M vs. ECNCX (231M). ECNCX (2.57) and CMBFX (2.48) have matching dividends . CMBFX was incepted earlier than ECNCX: CMBFX (41 years) vs ECNCX (19 years). ECNCX (1.45) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). ECNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. CMBFX (13.00). ECNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMBFX: ECNCX (1000) vs CMBFX (2000). CMBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.06 vs. ECNCX (0.09). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.34 vs. ECNCX (-2.81).
| CMBFX | ECNCX | CMBFX / ECNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.45 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.45 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.745 | 1.265 | 217% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 292M | 231M | 126% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.48 | 2.57 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.06 | 0.09 | 2,190% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.23 | 6.40 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.34 | -2.81 | -83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.73 | -0.18 | -9,376% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers