Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs ECNCX
CMBFX vs ECNCX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs ECNCX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.46
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets286.38M
Eaton Vance NC Municipal Income C
Price$8.77
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets226.89M
CMBFX vs ECNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. ECNCX commentary
Jul 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and ECNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 286M vs. ECNCX (227M). ECNCX (2.54) and CMBFX (2.46) have matching dividends . CMBFX was incepted earlier than ECNCX: CMBFX (41 years) vs ECNCX (19 years). ECNCX (1.45) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). ECNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. CMBFX (13.00). ECNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMBFX: ECNCX (1000) vs CMBFX (2000). CMBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.94 vs. ECNCX (-0.76). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 1.08 vs. ECNCX (-4.70).
| CMBFX | ECNCX | CMBFX / ECNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.45 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.45 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.716 | -1.305 | -55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 286M | 227M | 126% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.46 | 2.54 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.94 | -0.76 | -254% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.16 | 2.21 | 278% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.08 | -4.70 | -23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.90 | -2.71 | -549% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers