Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs ECNCX
CMBFX vs ECNCX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs ECNCX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.47
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets287.32M
Eaton Vance NC Municipal Income C
Price$8.74
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets225.92M
CMBFX vs ECNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. ECNCX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and ECNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 287M vs. ECNCX (226M). ECNCX (2.57) and CMBFX (2.48) have matching dividends . CMBFX was incepted earlier than ECNCX: CMBFX (41 years) vs ECNCX (19 years). ECNCX (1.45) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). ECNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. CMBFX (13.00). ECNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMBFX: ECNCX (1000) vs CMBFX (2000). CMBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.17 vs. ECNCX (-1.73). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 0.02 vs. ECNCX (-6.24).
| CMBFX | ECNCX | CMBFX / ECNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.45 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.45 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.029 | -1.320 | -78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 287M | 226M | 127% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.48 | 2.57 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.17 | -1.73 | -68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.85 | 0.65 | 750% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.02 | -6.24 | -0% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.51 | -3.02 | -480% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers