Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs ECNCX
CMBFX vs ECNCX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs ECNCX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.67
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets293.19M
Eaton Vance NC Municipal Income C
Price$9.03
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets239.41M
CMBFX vs ECNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. ECNCX commentary
Oct 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and ECNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 293M vs. ECNCX (239M). CMBFX pays higher dividends than ECNCX: CMBFX (2.46) vs ECNCX (2.29). CMBFX was incepted earlier than ECNCX: CMBFX (41 years) vs ECNCX (19 years). ECNCX (1.45) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). ECNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. CMBFX (12.00). ECNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMBFX: ECNCX (1000) vs CMBFX (2000). CMBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.78 vs. ECNCX (1.33). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 3.04 vs. ECNCX (-1.66).
| CMBFX | ECNCX | CMBFX / ECNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.45 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.45 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.136 | 1.943 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 293M | 239M | 123% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.46 | 2.29 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.78 | 1.33 | 208% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.30 | 9.07 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.04 | -1.66 | -183% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.78 | -0.12 | -12,927% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers