Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs ECORX
CMBFX vs ECORX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs ECORX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.38
Change-$0.03 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets290.23M
Eaton Vance OR Municipal Income C
Price$8.48
Change-$0.02 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets213.11M
CMBFX vs ECORX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. ECORX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and ECORX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 290M vs. ECORX (213M). ECORX pays higher dividends than CMBFX: ECORX (2.67) vs CMBFX (2.45). CMBFX was incepted earlier than ECORX: CMBFX (41 years) vs ECORX (19 years). ECORX (1.47) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). ECORX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. CMBFX (13.00). ECORX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMBFX: ECORX (1000) vs CMBFX (2000). CMBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.64 vs. ECORX (0.41). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 0.62 vs. ECORX (-5.69).
| CMBFX | ECORX | CMBFX / ECORX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.47 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.47 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.151 | -1.230 | 12% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 290M | 213M | 136% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.45 | 2.67 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.64 | 0.41 | 397% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.62 | 3.38 | 196% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.62 | -5.69 | -11% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.57 | 0.87 | 1,680% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement