Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs ECORX
CMBFX vs ECORX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs ECORX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.67
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets293.27M
Eaton Vance OR Municipal Income C
Price$8.72
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets226.01M
CMBFX vs ECORX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. ECORX commentary
Oct 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and ECORX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 293M vs. ECORX (226M). CMBFX (2.46) and ECORX (2.42) have matching dividends . CMBFX was incepted earlier than ECORX: CMBFX (41 years) vs ECORX (20 years). ECORX (1.47) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). ECORX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. CMBFX (12.00). ECORX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMBFX: ECORX (1000) vs CMBFX (2000). CMBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.87 vs. ECORX (1.54). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 3.13 vs. ECORX (-2.76).
| CMBFX | ECORX | CMBFX / ECORX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.47 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.47 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.224 | 2.149 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 293M | 226M | 130% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.46 | 2.42 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.87 | 1.54 | 186% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.39 | 9.94 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.13 | -2.76 | -113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.88 | 3.88 | 409% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement