Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs ECSCX
CMBFX vs ECSCX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs ECSCX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.71
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets296.56M
Eaton Vance SC Municipal Income C
Price$9.13
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets199.47M
CMBFX vs ECSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. ECSCX commentary
Nov 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and ECSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 297M vs. ECSCX (199M). ECSCX pays higher dividends than CMBFX: ECSCX (2.74) vs CMBFX (2.45). CMBFX was incepted earlier than ECSCX: CMBFX (41 years) vs ECSCX (20 years). ECSCX (1.46) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). ECSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. CMBFX (12.00). ECSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMBFX: ECSCX (1000) vs CMBFX (2000). CMBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.50 vs. ECSCX (1.36). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.86 vs. ECSCX (-2.17).
| CMBFX | ECSCX | CMBFX / ECSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.46 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.46 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.796 | 2.112 | 180% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 297M | 199M | 149% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.45 | 2.74 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.50 | 1.36 | 257% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.13 | 7.86 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.86 | -2.17 | -132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.70 | 2.05 | 815% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement