Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs ECSCX
CMBFX vs ECSCX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs ECSCX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.47
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets287.32M
Eaton Vance SC Municipal Income C
Price$8.78
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets189.49M
CMBFX vs ECSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. ECSCX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and ECSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 287M vs. ECSCX (189M). ECSCX pays higher dividends than CMBFX: ECSCX (2.88) vs CMBFX (2.48). CMBFX was incepted earlier than ECSCX: CMBFX (41 years) vs ECSCX (20 years). ECSCX (1.46) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). ECSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. CMBFX (13.00). ECSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMBFX: ECSCX (1000) vs CMBFX (2000). CMBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.17 vs. ECSCX (-2.18). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 0.02 vs. ECSCX (-6.24).
| CMBFX | ECSCX | CMBFX / ECSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.46 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.46 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.029 | -2.142 | -48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 287M | 189M | 152% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.48 | 2.88 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.17 | -2.18 | -54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.85 | 0.70 | 695% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.02 | -6.24 | -0% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.51 | -1.20 | -1,212% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers