Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs ECSCX
CMBFX vs ECSCX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs ECSCX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.67
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets293.19M
Eaton Vance SC Municipal Income C
Price$9.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets198.2M
CMBFX vs ECSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. ECSCX commentary
Oct 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and ECSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 293M vs. ECSCX (198M). ECSCX (2.54) and CMBFX (2.46) have matching dividends . CMBFX was incepted earlier than ECSCX: CMBFX (41 years) vs ECSCX (20 years). ECSCX (1.46) is less costly to investors than CMBFX (0.60). ECSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. CMBFX (12.00). ECSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CMBFX: ECSCX (1000) vs CMBFX (2000). CMBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.78 vs. ECSCX (0.70). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 3.04 vs. ECSCX (-2.37).
| CMBFX | ECSCX | CMBFX / ECSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.46 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 1.46 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.136 | 1.094 | 287% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 293M | 198M | 148% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.46 | 2.54 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.78 | 0.70 | 400% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.30 | 8.46 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.04 | -2.37 | -128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.78 | 1.24 | 1,273% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement