Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs EISCX
CMBFX vs EISCX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs EISCX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.42
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets287.14M
Eaton Vance SC Municipal Income I
Price$8.32
Change+$0.02 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets180.02M
CMBFX vs EISCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. EISCX commentary
Jun 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and EISCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 287M vs. EISCX (180M). EISCX pays higher dividends than CMBFX: EISCX (3.86) vs CMBFX (2.46). CMBFX was incepted earlier than EISCX: CMBFX (41 years) vs EISCX (17 years). CMBFX (0.60) is less costly to investors than EISCX (0.51). EISCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. CMBFX (13.00). CMBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EISCX: CMBFX (2000) vs EISCX (1000000). CMBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.48 vs. EISCX (-0.50). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 0.61 vs. EISCX (-2.15).
| CMBFX | EISCX | CMBFX / EISCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.51 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.51 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.069 | -2.071 | -3% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 287M | 180M | 159% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.46 | 3.86 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.48 | -0.50 | -294% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.30 | 4.76 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.61 | -2.15 | -28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.72 | 2.45 | 600% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement