Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CMBFX vs EISCX
CMBFX vs EISCX Comparison
Open Charts CMBFX vs EISCX
Columbia Oregon Itmt Muncpl Bd Inst
Price$11.72
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets296.5M
Eaton Vance SC Municipal Income I
Price$8.61
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets198.82M
CMBFX vs EISCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CMBFX vs. EISCX commentary
Dec 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMBFX is a Hold and EISCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMBFX has more cash in the bank: 297M vs. EISCX (199M). EISCX pays higher dividends than CMBFX: EISCX (3.68) vs CMBFX (2.46). CMBFX was incepted earlier than EISCX: CMBFX (41 years) vs EISCX (18 years). CMBFX (0.60) is less costly to investors than EISCX (0.51). EISCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. CMBFX (12.00). CMBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than EISCX: CMBFX (2000) vs EISCX (1000000). CMBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.41 vs. EISCX (1.95). CMBFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.95 vs. EISCX (1.36).
| CMBFX | EISCX | CMBFX / EISCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.51 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.51 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.885 | 2.846 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 297M | 199M | 149% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.46 | 3.68 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.41 | 1.95 | 175% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.74 | 10.27 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.95 | 1.36 | 216% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.34 | 6.56 | 249% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers